Crosswords1 min ago
Listener 4356 Mashonaland By Raffles
40 Answers
Some excellent clueing, especially where extra letters were unambiguously indicated. The end result may never win a prize for elegance, even with the speakers revealed, but the gridfill speeds up very quickly once you have enough to work with and becomes increasingly enjoyable. I know which of the speakers I prefer to listen to. Many thanks, Raffles.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by trux. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Probably two or three clues away from being able to finish this but with all of the highlighting done there's a limit to the amount of extra information I can get to break into that remainder. Ah, well. A nice idea that's been tied together very well, so thanks Raffles, although in general I'm not a fan of puzzles relying on this particular sort of thematic treatment.
Yes, I, too, thought that to be strictly correct, the Trojan Horse should have had a gap but took the risk of joining the letters there, as, logically, it had to have a complete base to stand on and be a complete structure. Of course, that is the kind of small assumption that can destroy a year's record.
That was VERY tough, and not terribly easy on the eye either. The spread of the 13 was also a little lopsided meaning that one area of the grid was infinitely trickier than the rest. Not one of my favourites, though the layout of the speakers was neat. I don’t think anyone without access to Google would have a hope in hell of getting the top line unless they were a buff. Thanks Raffles.
I also made heavy weather of this this afternoon, and indeed also had to rely on Google for a number of the thematic elements. Second speaker identified fairly quickly from a limited number of the extra letters, but the first somewhat later in the fill. Now just need to unravel the wordplay at 15 and the significance of the title. A tough solve, thanks to Raffles.
I really enjoyed this too, but I do think that 1ac and 33ac are borderline unfair.
Does anyone know whether Listener puzzles from, say, 20 years ago might have such obscure references? Or are setters allowing themselves a bit more licence now, in the knowledge that we all have access to search engines?
Does anyone know whether Listener puzzles from, say, 20 years ago might have such obscure references? Or are setters allowing themselves a bit more licence now, in the knowledge that we all have access to search engines?
This was the sort of thing I rather enjoy, despite being initially daunted by the preamble. I currently have a much-scribbled over (correct?) copy, and a print of a blank grid to check I am right on all the details before I send it in. Trux may find the title a giggle, but it is quite meaningless to me.
I thought this was remarkably uninspiring. There have been a number of identically themed puzzles before, all of which were better. There's little impressive about a puzzle with not much going on in the grid other than the few thematically-entered entries, and some of those answers were so obscure as to render the puzzle almost impossible to anybody without web access.
Uninspiring theme, uninspiring clues, and an uninspiring execution. This is one of those Listeners that within days I'll have forgotten it ever existed. Still, at least we got a full grid printed in the newspaper version this week, so that's a plus.
Uninspiring theme, uninspiring clues, and an uninspiring execution. This is one of those Listeners that within days I'll have forgotten it ever existed. Still, at least we got a full grid printed in the newspaper version this week, so that's a plus.
Sorry you're still cross, EV.
We only rumbled the precise connection between the answers that were to be thematically entered after we had finished.
In this case we knew of 33 but not 1.
However, as the theme emerges, they both turned out to be on very short lists of those most prominent in their category so we imagine that both would have been part of the general knowledge of many solvers.
We do agree though that much of the solving these days is rather dependent on access to the internet.
We only rumbled the precise connection between the answers that were to be thematically entered after we had finished.
In this case we knew of 33 but not 1.
However, as the theme emerges, they both turned out to be on very short lists of those most prominent in their category so we imagine that both would have been part of the general knowledge of many solvers.
We do agree though that much of the solving these days is rather dependent on access to the internet.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.