Road rules1 min ago
Look Again
1 Answers
If you take the time to look at the videos I described on my post below, you will see that your opponents are not stupid morons.
Richard Dawkins claims his beliefs are based on evidence, yet his only evidence for the universal constants, is based on his belief/hope, in a multiverse, that also explains abiogenesis. What a crock. By sticking to his guns, he sells more books and makes more money. It's his job. Being an idiot or wilfully blind, and blinding others, pays the bills. Check out my post below. Please please research yourselves, the science of Chuck Missler and prof Stephen C Meyer.
Richard Dawkins claims his beliefs are based on evidence, yet his only evidence for the universal constants, is based on his belief/hope, in a multiverse, that also explains abiogenesis. What a crock. By sticking to his guns, he sells more books and makes more money. It's his job. Being an idiot or wilfully blind, and blinding others, pays the bills. Check out my post below. Please please research yourselves, the science of Chuck Missler and prof Stephen C Meyer.
Answers
Only 1 answer
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I dislike Richard Dawkins' insulting attitude when he's railing about spiritual matters but I'm unsure one can justify suggesting a multiverse and abiogenesis is "a crock", nor that anyone is being "an idiot" or "willfully blind". These are likely scenarios. You seem in danger of using Richard's tactics of failing to make a convincing argument and so resorting to belittling those who disagree in an "Emperor's New Clothes" strategy.
Only 1 answer
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |