ChatterBank0 min ago
Listener No 4365: General Intelligence By Calmac
37 Answers
What a neat grid construction. I found finding the quotation a bit tedious, but the rest of the puzzle was a total delight, with some cleverly concealed misprints. Many thanks, Calmac.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by AHearer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I thought that Calmac had been extremely generous as I worked my way through this, only to realise that he had found one of (my many) weaknesses. Given a need to find x number of misprints, I can frequently fill a grid and discover only x -3. Now, all sorted, but I do agree about the "tedious" element. Obviously some of the misprints were very cunning. Thanks Calmac.
I was somewhat held up since I omitted to read the preamble correctly and the correct letters did not reveal much ! However once I overcame this oversight had the first and last words of the message, so quickly guessed what was required. Agreed that the final endgame was very neat, and bypassed much of the "tedious" element by guessing the first few words of the quotation after working out only a limited number of letters of each, and then googling the quotation from these. Final step then to go back and work out the remaining multiple missing misprints which were often well hidden indeed.
What is to be found in the grid is delightful and very clever. Having found the perpetrators, I left the puzzle and went out for some exercise. It was during that time I thought, "I wonder if..." When I returned to the puzzle and looked more closely at the grid I saw the icing on the cake.
The device used in the last stages of the puzzle is one I detest, it is so mind-numbingly tedious (I'd be happy if it were banned!). However, in this case it was possible to short-circuit most of the tedium using ODQ's keyword index.
It was a pity that there were so many entries with no unchecked letters (20, I think). That, coupled with some very easy clues, made filling the grid abnormally quick. I had the first four rows of the grid filled within three minutes. Admittedly it got a bit harder after that, and there were a lot of clues, so some may be grateful that they weren't hard.
The device used in the last stages of the puzzle is one I detest, it is so mind-numbingly tedious (I'd be happy if it were banned!). However, in this case it was possible to short-circuit most of the tedium using ODQ's keyword index.
It was a pity that there were so many entries with no unchecked letters (20, I think). That, coupled with some very easy clues, made filling the grid abnormally quick. I had the first four rows of the grid filled within three minutes. Admittedly it got a bit harder after that, and there were a lot of clues, so some may be grateful that they weren't hard.
It's true that some of the misprints were very hard to spot, but the clues were far too easy to present much of a challenge overall.
I've just finished working through the entire batch of 2009 Listeners, and most of the puzzles then seem to be in a different league (in terms of difficulty, if not quality). Out of that set, there were probably about 10 puzzles that were harder than anything I have seen from this year's setters.
I've just finished working through the entire batch of 2009 Listeners, and most of the puzzles then seem to be in a different league (in terms of difficulty, if not quality). Out of that set, there were probably about 10 puzzles that were harder than anything I have seen from this year's setters.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.