It's Back To The Sun And It's 1973 All Over Again!

[andy-hughes]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3459936/Charlotte-Crosby-flashes-underboob-raunchy-selfie.html

'Underboob'???

'Geordie PHWOAR'???

Are they serious???

This is the Daily Mail - bastion of Middle England!!!

What can possibly be going on?????

[ichkeria]

Middle England like a bit of flesh, don't you know ...
And it is white flesh, as they point out :-)

Talking of the Sun, did they actually can Page Three in the end? I lost track

[anotheoldgit]

The answer is in the section you were looking in, "SHOWBIZ".

[andy-hughes]

ichkeria - //Talking of the Sun, did they actually can Page Three in the end? I lost track //

I am not a reader, but occasionally glance at the copy in the sandwich shop while the ladies are constructing my lunch.

From what I can see, the are reluctant to lose the entire concept of doe-eyed young ladies gazing at the camera - so they tend to include them fully clothed - not sure if they still insert the odd 'old-style' pics.

[mikey4444]

Andy....for some DM readers, the senior ones perhaps, a quick flash maybe the highlight of their day !

[ummmm]

1973 is the best year ever!!! The year I was born :-)

[mikey4444]

1973 was a year for me,as it was when I left my teenagerhood behind for the last time.....its all been downhill since !

[anotheoldgit]

Some would have all nude paintings removed from our art galleries given half the chance, plus the banning of all nude models from art colleges etc.

[Elina]

Can I ask, do males find these kind of selfie pics attractive?

[andy-hughes]

Elina - //Can I ask, do males find these kind of selfie pics attractive? //

I have no issue with looking at pictures of attractive young women - my issue, and I'll freely admit it is a hobbyhorse of mine - is the ludicrous sub-sea-side post-card ooer missus, no! 1950's tittering captioning that goes with them.

For the most popular website in the UK, the Mail seems to appeal to a strangely restricted prurient infantile section of its readership with its endless pictures of 'taut abs' and 'tiny bottoms' 'busty ladies'and the other out-dated sniggering adjectives it uses.

It's a daily occurnece, and obviously it must be popular, otherwise it would have died away, but with the captioning I mentioned in my OP, it appears even the Mail is in danger of guffawing itself up its own fundament.

[naomi24]

I've never heard of Charlotte Crosby.

[anotheoldgit]

mikey4444

/// Andy....for some DM readers, the senior ones perhaps, a quick flash maybe the highlight of their
day ///

Who was it that looked in the Daily Mail website and not to read the news, but to purposely select the very section, TV & Showbiz, that the offending images were displayed and then went to the trouble to post this thread?

Of course it is plain to see without me naming names, at least I hope it highlighted his day.

[sp1814]

andy-hughes

Out of interest, has the Daily Mail now suspended its crusade against online porn, or is the battle still ongoing???

[david small]

Not attractive, slightly nauseating, vanity is not an admirable trait.

[ChillDoubt]

She has 4.2 million Instagram followers? By my estimation, 4.2 million people need to seriously reconsider their role in the human race.

[Buenchico]

>>> For the most popular website in the UK . . .

???

I would have placed the BBC website above that of the Daily Mail in the 'most visited' rankings and Alexa agrees (with the BBC site at No.7 and the Daily Wail at No.16).

I surprised (but somewhat pleased) that The Grauniad gets into the Top 20 at No.18 but I realise how out of touch with youth culture I must be be if I never even considered LADbible as a contender for a top twenty ranking (at No.12)!

http://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/GB

[Svejk]

I'm astonished at andy's, new found, censorious attitude.

[Elina]

David/ Chill ... I agree. 4.2 million followers. 4.2 million selfie culture like brains out there ... that's the future .. how scary is that?

[andy-hughes]

Buenchicho - //>>> For the most popular website in the UK . . .

??? //

Apologies - that should include 'national newspaper website'.