Food & Drink1 min ago
Another Way Brussels Is Spending Our Money
34 Answers
Giving it to client organisations to do the bidding of the EU
http:// www.pre ssreade r.com/u k/scott ish-dai ly-mail /201604 11/2819 9467164 8583
Bribes is how describe it. More examples of EU mismanagement
http://
Bribes is how describe it. More examples of EU mismanagement
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by lindapalmara. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Sp
Almost every newspaper is bias about the eu. The DM is as biased as the Guardian (tax dodgers!) and other left wing papers. I read it because it has investigative journalists who have won many awards, have successfully pioneered on many issues and is not afraid to refute all this cr?p coming out of Downing Street.
Almost every newspaper is bias about the eu. The DM is as biased as the Guardian (tax dodgers!) and other left wing papers. I read it because it has investigative journalists who have won many awards, have successfully pioneered on many issues and is not afraid to refute all this cr?p coming out of Downing Street.
I would steer clear of 'tax dodgers' as a sobriquet to describe the Guardian.
Lord Rothermere (the owner of the Daily Mail) enjoys 'non-dom' status, which he inherited from his father, who lived for most of his life in France.
However, the current Lord Rothermere, actually lives in Britain, but of course - pays the tax of a non-dom.
The Daily Mail and General Trust are owned through a Bermudan company (and a series of offshore trusts) so that the principal beneficiary, the “non-domiciled” Lord Rothermere, can avoid tax on his income from the group.
Lord Rothermere (the owner of the Daily Mail) enjoys 'non-dom' status, which he inherited from his father, who lived for most of his life in France.
However, the current Lord Rothermere, actually lives in Britain, but of course - pays the tax of a non-dom.
The Daily Mail and General Trust are owned through a Bermudan company (and a series of offshore trusts) so that the principal beneficiary, the “non-domiciled” Lord Rothermere, can avoid tax on his income from the group.
Nice try in attempting to deflect from the left wing rag by discussing others sp.
Take a look at this, the Grundian is up to its necks in tax avoidance.
http:// blogs.s pectato r.co.uk /2016/0 4/will- the-gua rdian-n ow-inve stigate -its-ow n-tax-a rrangem ents/
All perfectly legal, just as all the other revalations, except for all the hypocracy of the liberal left.
Do as I saynot aas I do springs to mind
Take a look at this, the Grundian is up to its necks in tax avoidance.
http://
All perfectly legal, just as all the other revalations, except for all the hypocracy of the liberal left.
Do as I saynot aas I do springs to mind
youngmafbog
I see your Spectator, and raise you Private Eye:
https:/ /beastr abban.w ordpres s.com/2 015/04/ 10/priv ate-eye -on-dai ly-mail s-hypoc risy-ov er-tax- avoidan ce/
Hypocrisy all round?
I see your Spectator, and raise you Private Eye:
https:/
Hypocrisy all round?
sp1814
/// Are we going to take this report at face value without any analysis? ///
Is this the analysis you are seeking?
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-35 35018/W hy-Brit ain-nev er-want s-Europ e-Seven ty-time s-tried -block- EU-laws -Sevent y-times -failed -Euro-M P-DANIE L-HANNA N-lays- bare-im potence -Brusse ls.html
/// Are we going to take this report at face value without any analysis? ///
Is this the analysis you are seeking?
http://
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.