ChatterBank2 mins ago
Should We Re-Nationalise British Rail?
37 Answers
I am delighted that Jezza is on board here....
http://
But he's going off half c0ck3d. Yes I admit that TGL was wrong here, the rail system has been a disaster since privatisation, in fact I'd go as far to say that the vandalism following the Beeching report start the destruction of our rail system. Socialist though I must sound now, we need a proper nationwide rail system, subsidised by the fortune they take from the roads. Your brickbats and nosegays are awaited.......
http://
But he's going off half c0ck3d. Yes I admit that TGL was wrong here, the rail system has been a disaster since privatisation, in fact I'd go as far to say that the vandalism following the Beeching report start the destruction of our rail system. Socialist though I must sound now, we need a proper nationwide rail system, subsidised by the fortune they take from the roads. Your brickbats and nosegays are awaited.......
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The rail system is already nationalised in all but name.
Railtrack went bust and its apalling safety record became an embarrassment. So the Government set up Network rail, a non profit making organisation financed by the treasury.
The failure on Southern Trains is down to a very poor franchisee. The Department of Transport (or whatever it is called these days) should re-allcate that route.
Railtrack went bust and its apalling safety record became an embarrassment. So the Government set up Network rail, a non profit making organisation financed by the treasury.
The failure on Southern Trains is down to a very poor franchisee. The Department of Transport (or whatever it is called these days) should re-allcate that route.
TGL? I thought it was Major's work. British Rail was never that great but it was way better than the current disconnected shambles. Transport For London is creating a coherent system for London, joining up underground, overground, trams and driverless DLR into a single network. The whole country needs similarly joined up thinking (obviously a huge job, I know).
The problem with the rail system is that it fell prey to the Tories' bizarre notion of 'market forces' and their obsession that 'competition' is always a good thing that raises standards.
The breaking up of the rail system into individual companies was a complete disaster - but how could it have ever been anything else?
If you take a public service, and give it to people who need to make money for shareholders because their salaries and bonuses are based on dividends, you have instant problems from Day One.
The notion of providing a service flies out of the window, and the notion of making a profit walks in through the door.
This gives everyone at the top end tunnel vision, and serious concentrated short-term aims - namely maximum profit for minimum outlay.
Cue massive underinvestment and safety shortcuts as everything and anything is sacrificed in the name of profit.
So yes, since it was and still is effectively a utility, it should be in public ownership, which of course will never happen while the Conservatives are in charge - which means probably not in my lifetime.
As for the little country stations shut by Beeching jambutty., I am afraid you are letting sentiment get in the way of business there.
What Beeching did was conduct a simple exercise is passenger numbers - those below a minimum operating level to make them viable were closed - under the 'use it or lose it' system which must operate if a rail system is not to be a massive drain on public resources.
Run properly, the rail network should be perfectly serviceable - as long as they abandon this HS2 nonsense - another vanity project doomed to failure due to lack of proper planning and costing.
The breaking up of the rail system into individual companies was a complete disaster - but how could it have ever been anything else?
If you take a public service, and give it to people who need to make money for shareholders because their salaries and bonuses are based on dividends, you have instant problems from Day One.
The notion of providing a service flies out of the window, and the notion of making a profit walks in through the door.
This gives everyone at the top end tunnel vision, and serious concentrated short-term aims - namely maximum profit for minimum outlay.
Cue massive underinvestment and safety shortcuts as everything and anything is sacrificed in the name of profit.
So yes, since it was and still is effectively a utility, it should be in public ownership, which of course will never happen while the Conservatives are in charge - which means probably not in my lifetime.
As for the little country stations shut by Beeching jambutty., I am afraid you are letting sentiment get in the way of business there.
What Beeching did was conduct a simple exercise is passenger numbers - those below a minimum operating level to make them viable were closed - under the 'use it or lose it' system which must operate if a rail system is not to be a massive drain on public resources.
Run properly, the rail network should be perfectly serviceable - as long as they abandon this HS2 nonsense - another vanity project doomed to failure due to lack of proper planning and costing.
Latest Posts
Motoring4 mins ago
Listener 4842 For Me And You By...
Crosswords5 mins ago
Crosswords5 mins ago
Trump/Ukraine, What Will He Do?
News7 mins ago
