One Hundred Years Of Solitude. Netflix.
Film, Media & TV0 min ago
Julian Assange Calls Hilary A 'demon'
26 Answers
http://
Julian who?
Bit rich coming from him of all people, isn't it?
Julian who?
Bit rich coming from him of all people, isn't it?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by DTCwordfan. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
ichkeria
/// Well we all know which camp Assange is in. ///
And which one would that be then, the 'cholera' camp or the 'gonorrhea' camp?
*** Assange has also denied he is supporting Trump by releasing information on the Democratic party, and has previously described this election as being a choice between 'cholera and gonorrhea.' ***
/// Well we all know which camp Assange is in. ///
And which one would that be then, the 'cholera' camp or the 'gonorrhea' camp?
*** Assange has also denied he is supporting Trump by releasing information on the Democratic party, and has previously described this election as being a choice between 'cholera and gonorrhea.' ***
The Putin camp AOG.
I don't know if the Russians really are in cahoots with Trump: they would certainly like him to be president, and they have certainly been caught spying on the democrats. Assange is a willing part of the Russian media campaign to undermine the west's confidence in itself. Why do they do it It is not for the sake of "world domination" that is for sure, but they certainly do it.
And half of Corbyn's advisers seem to be in the same sorry boat.
I don't know if the Russians really are in cahoots with Trump: they would certainly like him to be president, and they have certainly been caught spying on the democrats. Assange is a willing part of the Russian media campaign to undermine the west's confidence in itself. Why do they do it It is not for the sake of "world domination" that is for sure, but they certainly do it.
And half of Corbyn's advisers seem to be in the same sorry boat.
anybody know if the Swedish prosecutor has been to the Ecuadorian embassy in London yet and, if so, what the outcome was. All they need to do is to offer a guarantee that JA will not be extradited Stateside and leave the CIA to do a Litvinenko or have the Russians take it on, as they seem to be quite efficient as this.
If and when Assange leaves the embassy and it turns out that the US don't even want him alive, never mind want him dead, then all anyone will remember is the criminal charges and a couple of sexy transcripts (which someone else had the courage/foolhardiness to steal).
And the myth of Julian will be exploded forever :-)
And the myth of Julian will be exploded forever :-)
DTC > anybody know if the Swedish prosecutor has been to the Ecuadorian embassy in London yet and, if so, what the outcome was
I said severals years ago they should have gone but didn't which resulted in criticism from some 'body' I can't remember who.
At least one of the charges were dropped as it had time lapsed.
Assange doesn't trust that he may be handed over to the US...
I said severals years ago they should have gone but didn't which resulted in criticism from some 'body' I can't remember who.
At least one of the charges were dropped as it had time lapsed.
Assange doesn't trust that he may be handed over to the US...
DTC - It seems Ecuador would not co-operate:-
“The Ministry of Justice notices that Ecuador maintains its position that a specific agreement must be undertaken between Sweden and Ecuador in order for Ecuador to grant legal assistance in accordance with the Swedish request,” it said.
“The Ministry of Justice can only reiterate that it is not customary to establish a specific agreement concerning any individual request for legal assistance. Such an agreement must be considered redundant, given the specified content of the Swedish request and common practices”
The Swedish communiqué then hardened its position.
“The Ministry of Justice kindly asks once more Ecuador to reconsider its position,” it states. “If not, the Ministry of Justice would have to conclude that Ecuador is not prepared to grant the legal assistance requested by Sweden.”
“The Ministry of Justice notices that Ecuador maintains its position that a specific agreement must be undertaken between Sweden and Ecuador in order for Ecuador to grant legal assistance in accordance with the Swedish request,” it said.
“The Ministry of Justice can only reiterate that it is not customary to establish a specific agreement concerning any individual request for legal assistance. Such an agreement must be considered redundant, given the specified content of the Swedish request and common practices”
The Swedish communiqué then hardened its position.
“The Ministry of Justice kindly asks once more Ecuador to reconsider its position,” it states. “If not, the Ministry of Justice would have to conclude that Ecuador is not prepared to grant the legal assistance requested by Sweden.”
DTC > I can't see any time soon.
He did publicly say he would come out if the European Court ruling wouldn't rule in his favour (which he already knew the answer!) The small international group including the Aussie rep who abstained predictably.
All to the dismay of the UK authorities and the irritation of Mr Hammond!
He did publicly say he would come out if the European Court ruling wouldn't rule in his favour (which he already knew the answer!) The small international group including the Aussie rep who abstained predictably.
All to the dismay of the UK authorities and the irritation of Mr Hammond!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.