ChatterBank2 mins ago
Listener 4480 The Code Duello By Agricola
18 Answers
A new setter, I believe and he really presented us with a challenge. I dislike Playfair almost as much as jumbles and am really happy that there are programmes that help on line. What a relief when we saw where we were going and everything worked. Many thanks to Agricola.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Ruthrobin. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.And there was me thinking we'd got away without a Playfair this year...
I share RR's dislike of Playfair and have always skipped them, or just filled in the normal answers and left it there, until the likes of Quinapalus provided an electronic means to "finish" these puzzles without too much effort. Perhaps using such aids is not cricket in some people's eyes, but for me Playfair codes fall right into the "life's too short" basket and anything that will crack them quickly is OK in my book. Just my opinion, of course!
At least in this case the code words had relevance, which made the puzzle far more enjoyable. This may be in contravention of the Notes for Setters which states that "The editors will not accept puzzles that use Playfair encryption where the code word or phrase may be guessed from the theme" - a ruling which I have always found perverse since a relevant thematic word surely justifies the Playfair device rather more than some random word. Again, just my opinion!
I don't think that the code words could have been guessed from the theme here, but once you get them you do feel that there is some point to it all.
This is all rather grumpy so let me say that if we've got to have Playfair, this is by far the best way to do it. Well done, Agricola.
I share RR's dislike of Playfair and have always skipped them, or just filled in the normal answers and left it there, until the likes of Quinapalus provided an electronic means to "finish" these puzzles without too much effort. Perhaps using such aids is not cricket in some people's eyes, but for me Playfair codes fall right into the "life's too short" basket and anything that will crack them quickly is OK in my book. Just my opinion, of course!
At least in this case the code words had relevance, which made the puzzle far more enjoyable. This may be in contravention of the Notes for Setters which states that "The editors will not accept puzzles that use Playfair encryption where the code word or phrase may be guessed from the theme" - a ruling which I have always found perverse since a relevant thematic word surely justifies the Playfair device rather more than some random word. Again, just my opinion!
I don't think that the code words could have been guessed from the theme here, but once you get them you do feel that there is some point to it all.
This is all rather grumpy so let me say that if we've got to have Playfair, this is by far the best way to do it. Well done, Agricola.
Quiet in here tonight, but then I've missed quite a few puzzles this year by dint of necessity. A minor operation earlier in the week has provided me with a much-needed incentive to slow down and enjoy myself more, and this was a perfect diversion, which I took my time over. As others have admitted, Quinapalus is now the weapon of choice for Playfair, which got me home and dry with a smile. Nice to have the thematic creature as an essential confirmation of which code to use where. Thank you, Agricola.
Welcome back, HappyUncle, and pleased to see you happy.
Like others I also found the Quinapalus site invaluable. In the past I have quite enjoyed working out the Playfair code for myself, but with no idea of the answer to 10d, uncertainty about 1a, and only four sets of checked letter pairs, I had little to go on. Normally one has a collection of four-letter and six-letter answers with one or two unchecked letters each.
As to whether or not that is cricket, Hagen, I'm happy to resort to the aid because I'm not convinced that the setter 'played fair.' The clues to 1 and 10 do not conform to Listener rules. In the clue to 1 there is an element that normally would require an indication that is obsolete and dialect. The clue to 10d strikes me as, let's say, 'unsound.' If I am wrong then my pronunciation all these years has been faulty.
Like others I also found the Quinapalus site invaluable. In the past I have quite enjoyed working out the Playfair code for myself, but with no idea of the answer to 10d, uncertainty about 1a, and only four sets of checked letter pairs, I had little to go on. Normally one has a collection of four-letter and six-letter answers with one or two unchecked letters each.
As to whether or not that is cricket, Hagen, I'm happy to resort to the aid because I'm not convinced that the setter 'played fair.' The clues to 1 and 10 do not conform to Listener rules. In the clue to 1 there is an element that normally would require an indication that is obsolete and dialect. The clue to 10d strikes me as, let's say, 'unsound.' If I am wrong then my pronunciation all these years has been faulty.
Thank you for your kind words, Scorpius. I agree that the Playfair challenge short-changed the solver in comparison with the usual levels of assistance provided - bad enough with only one code word but probably impossible with two. I'm glad my intuition took me straight to the automated method.
I don't feel that the clues to 1 and 10 were unacceptably liberal, though. The setter had limited freedom of length in both, and I was happy to forgive the omission in the clue to 1. As for 10, without giving anything away, I would say that the first word of the clue applies to both the first and second syllables of the answer, giving the pronunciation that I've always used, and which would have been used by the original 10d as well.
I don't feel that the clues to 1 and 10 were unacceptably liberal, though. The setter had limited freedom of length in both, and I was happy to forgive the omission in the clue to 1. As for 10, without giving anything away, I would say that the first word of the clue applies to both the first and second syllables of the answer, giving the pronunciation that I've always used, and which would have been used by the original 10d as well.
Happyuncle I'm quite obsessive but not quite that far along the spectrum - yet! Had a stent op - the bigger drama was a few months back when I was an emergency admission with a heart attack. So this was a follow-up op. 45 minutes of staring at a ceiling whilst someone pokes wires around inside where no wires really ought to go, and they got lost at one point, and then four hours of enforced bed rest whilst chained to an ECG machine. So Agricola helped to divert my attention away from my ever-burgeoning bladder. Hope you are doing well
Well, I found this bruising, especially cracking those two wordplay clues without definition or any crossing letters. The Playfair bit was not so difficult after that. So, thanks Agricola, but it's not my kind of puzzle.
But I'm sorry to learn of regulars here going under the knife - I really hope you both feel better soon.
But I'm sorry to learn of regulars here going under the knife - I really hope you both feel better soon.
I cordially dislike Playfairs (never was a device less accurately named), but this was actually a very good puzzle.
The two code words were relevant to the theme (as I think Playfair words in Listeners should be) and the either/or mechanism made for some interesting clueing.
A happy use of a few hours in snowbound Northants - thanks Agricola.
The two code words were relevant to the theme (as I think Playfair words in Listeners should be) and the either/or mechanism made for some interesting clueing.
A happy use of a few hours in snowbound Northants - thanks Agricola.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.