Donate SIGN UP

Should Such Scum, Be Allowed Legal Aid?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 13:45 Wed 08th Aug 2018 | News
57 Answers
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6039089/Three-men-Rochdale-child-sex-abuse-gang-lose-citizenship-appeal.html

/// Figures released under Freedom of Information laws show Rauf was granted £282,370, Khan £282,289 and Aziz £195,277 for their unsuccessful court battle. ///

/// But the figures are set to rise as three of the men are spending tens of thousands of pounds paying lawyers working on their bid to beat deportation. ///

Or is it money well spent if we remove them from this country?

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 57rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It's a complete and utter P take.
I'm not absolutely sure who scores lowest, clients or lawyers.
Their 'right to a family life' will be a formidable hurdle.
It's impossible not to have a bad taste in one's mouth reading this; nevertheless, the principle of legal aid, certainly earlier in their legal battle, is surely one worth preserving. They were entitled to defend themselves, owing to presumption of innocence, and we clearly cannot countenance a world where only the well-off can mount a legal defence.

I should assume, anyway, that the money is ultimately going to the lawyers rather than to the men concerned.
My opinion is that the right not to be raped by dead-eyed savages trumps their right to a family life and possibly saves any daughters they may have years of worry.
No problem with sending their family to pakistan with them,they can still their family life there if they want it so bad.
er there are sections of the legal aid rules
that control/end their right to legal aid
if the case is estimated to be a non-starter

what is their excuse?
that their throats will be cut if they go home?
sort of shows ( shush! ) that the religions of puce disapproves doesnt it?
I don't care about these people, they are the lowest of the low, worse than germs. All these delaying tactics to stay in this country are sick in the extreme. Why can't we just line them up and shoot them ???
I'd happily fire the first round.
Same here NoM.
Their 'right to a family life' will be a formidable hurdle.

And what about the actual question?

Convicted rapists... Kick them out Now.
you would think they would be keen to leave, i wonder why they want to remain...could it be the benefits system nhs etc, i think so.
they despise us and laugh at us, uk kindness to them is weakness.
Question Author
I can't quite make this out, it says that they have lost their appeal against deportation, yet if deportation orders are signed against them, the three men will have the right to appeal on human rights grounds.
They will argue that deportation will infringe their right to a family life as enshrined in Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
In the past violent drug dealers, for example, have used this to successfully argue against being sent back to their homelands.
No.
Question Author
sandyRoe

"The European Convention on Human Rights!, will we be still lumbered with that when we finely escape our dictators?
At the moment, the only correct answer to that is "don't know".
Surely the time has come to arrange for a convicted rapist to have his bits removed ( preferably with two bricks, & before anyone asks it doesn't hurt if one keeps ones thumbs out of the way)
The European Convention on Human Rights has nothing whatsoever to do with the European Union and our leaving will make no difference to matters like this.
My family is being hounded by a Bangladeshi fighting deportation and funded by legal aid.
Article 8 of the ECHR is the culprit.
We Brits count for nothing.
Yes we need a strong leader to sort out this mess.
We could provide a,"Pound Shop," cheap legal aid system for illegals. That would save us money.
Anybody who could string a sentence together could represent them.
dam savages should not see the light of day again in my opinion, when TROB let them out their feet should not touch, end of. If it was up to me they'd get the Saddam shuffle, kin vermin.

1 to 20 of 57rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Should Such Scum, Be Allowed Legal Aid?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.