Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Any Justification For Not Showing That 4 Of The Two Word Answers Were Two Words?
10 Answers
To me that was just cheating!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Pipsqueak65. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I'm assuming it was the Guardian Prize crossword by Maskarade. I feel that there was a mistake in the proof-reading in that 3 answers were listed as two words when the pre-amble suggested that they should only have been listed by the total number of letters.
The fact that some were listed one way and some the other just confused matters.
The fact that some were listed one way and some the other just confused matters.
It was confusing - but I suppose the setter just about covered himself as he did say 'thirty-three solutions in total consist of two parts' - 26 letter clues + 2 two-word clues, so 5 other clues must also be two-word clues. But it was hard enough without that!
And I suspect I wasn't alone in never having heard of a fair number of the alphebetical clues...
And I suspect I wasn't alone in never having heard of a fair number of the alphebetical clues...
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.