ChatterBank2 mins ago
Is There Any Further Point In "talks" Between Treason And Cob Et Al?
45 Answers
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ story/c abinet- agrees- not-to- kill-of f-brexi t-talks -with-l abour-a nd-deba tes-com promise s-11719 874
Both parties are only doing their best to thwart democracy, let's stop the pretense they are trying to move forward on this.
Both parties are only doing their best to thwart democracy, let's stop the pretense they are trying to move forward on this.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The majority for Brexit was very small. There's no guarantee a revote would have a brexit majority. MPs are overall Remainers. No solution has been found so far which Parliament is prepared to accept- No Deal, May's Deal and numerous indicative vote ideas have been rejected. There needs to be an attempt to find a solution which gives a form of Brexit which would be passed by the house and would perhaps win public support if there was another referendum. May would have been criticised whether she tried to talk to Labour or refused to talk.
Maybe the talks will lead to nothing being agreed and , coupled with the EUro MEP vote and maybe a May resignations may lead to a hard Brexit.
Anyone who still believes we could/should leave with with no plan and ignore the views of elected MPS are deluded
Maybe the talks will lead to nothing being agreed and , coupled with the EUro MEP vote and maybe a May resignations may lead to a hard Brexit.
Anyone who still believes we could/should leave with with no plan and ignore the views of elected MPS are deluded
Brexit Day is currently to be Halloween, isn't it? I'm not sure we'd need an extension to do another referendum (which in my opinion is a terrible idea but it's looking increasingly likely).
Brexit was always going to have to get through parliament, and because of Conservative hubris in 2017, doing so requires horse trading with the opposition. If the Corbyn-May talks provide some way out of this nightmare I'm all for them. Alas, they seem to be leaning toward yet another round of division and instability.
Brexit was always going to have to get through parliament, and because of Conservative hubris in 2017, doing so requires horse trading with the opposition. If the Corbyn-May talks provide some way out of this nightmare I'm all for them. Alas, they seem to be leaning toward yet another round of division and instability.
There is a difference Spicerack between a government with a majority and a parliament without a majority. Having said that the governemnt, even if it had a small majority, wouldn't have got it through because there were some on either side of the Tories who would have voted against any option on the grounds it was both too hard a brexit and too soft a brexit. Ina hung parliament teh opposition parties were certainly never going to support the government.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.