Apologies, I was away from the screen...
I prefer & enjoy a straight, well-set cryptic puzzle. I've rarely considered - for example - the Times to be a "write-in" - easier some days than others, but always fair.
All the faffing about with - as in today's puzzle, eg - double grids & *undefined* answers are devices to drag out the conclusion, nothing more. "More challenging"? Not really, just twice as long to finish.
I find it much more satisfying to complete a "normal" yet difficult puzzle than to humour a setter's desire to muck about. As I said before, I do them but I don't really get any enjoyment from solving what are often poor clues that have the feeling of having been shoehorned in.
diddlydo - don't worry about it, I've been told that I was born a "grumpy old man" & I know I'm in a serious minority when it comes to Araucaria & those that follow & use his ideas, but I'm not going to change now.