News0 min ago
Slut-Shaming
This article interested me, being rather an apposite example of the inferior status of the fairer sex which even in these "modern" times still permeates our culture.
It comments on the "coincidence" of three cases recently receiving publicity (Lewinsky, Roos, and Baillie) - odd that they should all three be regurgitated at about the same time although all well in the past.
You've still got an uphill task Ladies, but don't despair, we've come a long way in the last 123 years.
https:/
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I don't think it's an odd coincidence. The interest in Roos is due to the Beckham documentary and Baillie is because of the Brand scandal, both current events.
I don't know why Lewinsky is back in the news but are any of these women considered to be slots? Maybe by The Guardian, not by me. Baillie in particular was viewed as a victim, with sympathy in the main.
Those that believe it exists are doomed to experience it wherever they look.
No one is a slut because they indulged in a little sexual activity. It is a word reserved for someone who many casual sexual partners as habit/practice. Something that suggests they have an underlying problem that needs tackling.
Both sexes can be looked down on if indulging with many partners rather than building a single relationship. If women seem more affected than men it is probably the result of social norms where one has to be very persuasive and socially expert to convince one woman to join them, let alone a different one each night; which impresses others as to how he manages it; whereas a women simply needs to pick a partner for the night and indicate she is willing in order to score, which isn't seen as very difficult.
'He's a bit of a dog' always seems to be said with a nudge and a leer,
has no one on AB heard of dogging? - not something I might boast about - er if I were young enough to do it.
Queen Elizabeth ( I'll let you guess which one) called Drake " a gay dog" - er 1590 that is! and I dont think she meant " he whistleth the live-long day". The night ed of AB has just assured me that such comments are far beyond the scope of over 68% of AB
thank god someone tole me who the last two were.
Little known factoid - you know that two of the three mentioned, the wronged spouses belted ( smacked across the mouf, you know hooter) the men responsbile
Hillary Clinton and Victoria beckham.
I think it would be better to compare whoever shook the label off. Camilla did, Leddy Hamilton ( you know, Nelson's bit onthe side) didnt - Anne Boleyn ( The King's Botch) is remembered for other things. Sophia Dorothea just had one ( Konigsmark) but more than once a night....
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.