ChatterBank5 mins ago
Inquisitor 137 No Yens by Schadenfreude
24 Answers
Congratulations to anyone who has finished this. It's tough, much more difficult than anything the Listener series has had to offer this year. I have six entries to make, with 22ac being the most puzzling - any help would be appreciated.
For anyone struggling with this, my strategy was, firstly, to identify the 20 clues with the extra word - their grid lengths match the bracketed numbers. That could lead to enough of the quotation to be helpful. Secondly, I tried the non-asterisked remaining clues. This confirmed the theme. I left the asterisked clues until last. Bradford was of limited help. Some of the thematic material in its untreated form was pretty recondite to me. Good luck with it, and I doff my hat to Schadenfreude - the construction is superbly elegant.
For anyone struggling with this, my strategy was, firstly, to identify the 20 clues with the extra word - their grid lengths match the bracketed numbers. That could lead to enough of the quotation to be helpful. Secondly, I tried the non-asterisked remaining clues. This confirmed the theme. I left the asterisked clues until last. Bradford was of limited help. Some of the thematic material in its untreated form was pretty recondite to me. Good luck with it, and I doff my hat to Schadenfreude - the construction is superbly elegant.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Speravi. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I agree entirely, Speravi, this was tougher than any recent Listener. Like you, I was held up in exactly the same spot, until 22ac dawned on me and the intersecting clues quickly followed.
It was very cleverly done, but much of the thematic material was almost beyond obscure to me. Maybe that simply shows how poorly read I am!
I have a minor quibble with 16ac, for obvious reasons if I've got it right. But well done for cracking it
It was very cleverly done, but much of the thematic material was almost beyond obscure to me. Maybe that simply shows how poorly read I am!
I have a minor quibble with 16ac, for obvious reasons if I've got it right. But well done for cracking it
Thanks for your reply, turnerjmw. I've posted my entry, so I can't be sure, but I think that 16ac was one that I had to deduce from various bits of evidence, rather than nailing it absolutely. Looking at the clue suggests that an anagram was involved, was your quibble that the anagram doesn't work? If so, that's reassuring.
I'm waiting to see what comes up in relation to EV 875. I have a completed grid - and little idea what's going on!
I'm waiting to see what comes up in relation to EV 875. I have a completed grid - and little idea what's going on!
Re: 16ac, my cavil was that the grid entry also appeared in the clue, as the last word. I thought the wordplay led to Delvig, as an anagram of g(o)d and evil. But it was my last one.
I'm in the same boat on EV 875, too! Happy with a full grid, but slight uncertainty about a couple of the subsidiary down indications (19d could be nothing or at least two letters, as far as I can tell).
I only have the online version, which has 7d as "Last opera vcompany snubbed artist". I have assumed the v is a misprint. Do you know if it appears in the paper?
I'm in the same boat on EV 875, too! Happy with a full grid, but slight uncertainty about a couple of the subsidiary down indications (19d could be nothing or at least two letters, as far as I can tell).
I only have the online version, which has 7d as "Last opera vcompany snubbed artist". I have assumed the v is a misprint. Do you know if it appears in the paper?
I have the clues to Inq. 137, rather crumpled now having been fished out of the recycling bag! I do remember thinking that there was an infelicity of the sort you describe, somewhere.
On EV 875, the intrusive "v" appears in print. At first I took the stick to be "gad", but I think it should be "goad".
On EV 875, the intrusive "v" appears in print. At first I took the stick to be "gad", but I think it should be "goad".
I assumed the point of the multiple clues was to make the grid entry easier for those particular ones, as they all resolve to the same thing. It's true that one of 2dn could have had an asterisk (if the definition was removed) but then so could one of 25ac, and so could 21dn, I guess. I can only imagine Schadenfreude didn't want to mix asterisked and unasterisked clues together.
I thought 23dn had to be Holberg
http://www.questia.com/library/encyclopedia/ho lberg_ludvig_baron.jsp
I thought 23dn had to be Holberg
http://www.questia.com/library/encyclopedia/ho lberg_ludvig_baron.jsp
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.