Quizzes & Puzzles38 mins ago
Listener 4057 Inside, by Hypnos
66 Answers
Where is everybody? Or are you finding the wordplay as difficult as I did. This was a nice, easy grid fill and the alternatives and associatives were fun, but oh dear, did I struggle with the endgame! Perhaps it was so easy for you experts that you are not bothering to appear this week?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by robinruth. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Actually this discussion brings up a question that i have wondered about for some time. When does an abbreviation, linked via its full word(s), become allowed to be clued via a synonym. A popular example, which came up recently in a listener, would be OS being clued as large, extra large or exceptionally large, but the true full meaning is outsize. I am sure there are many others.
Oh, and while on the subject of clothes sizes, S,M,L,XL are commonly used abbrevations but only XL and M are in chambers....why?
Oh, and while on the subject of clothes sizes, S,M,L,XL are commonly used abbrevations but only XL and M are in chambers....why?
Midazolam, in answer to your question I'd say that very common abbreviations (ie common in crosswords) can be, and are, clued by synonyms. L, for example, meaning 'learner' is frequently clued by a synonym, as indeed it is in this puzzle. On the other hand I don't think the editors would permit D for Director or daughter to be clued as 'manager' or 'female offspring'. There's no precise logic to dictate what is or is not allowed; it's just a matter of convention and fairness.
I don't know the answer to your second question. It's always puzzled me that L and S do not appear as 'large' and 'small' in Chambers. It would expand the cluing possibilities if they were.
I don't know the answer to your second question. It's always puzzled me that L and S do not appear as 'large' and 'small' in Chambers. It would expand the cluing possibilities if they were.
I had thought of "grouse" but didn't think to look it up - has Wellington moved a few hundred miles? I've found a 5-letter word which I think matches, but I was expecting it to be placed a bit better with respect to the accessory, and to have a different shape. Are there any rules/conventions about how words can be hidden in grids?
Not over the final wall yet and still have one association and one alternative to find - although they don't seem to have much bearing on the final outcome. Have a possible accessory but as it's a clue answer that seems too obvious. And have a regional variant but it's a letter too short. Guess I keep looking.
Unless I\'m missing something I can\'t see the point of 3 of the alternative clues and all the associative ones. They might just as well have been included with all the others. I thought for some time that it was the alternative/associated words which had to be entered. The theme can worked out from the anagram of the 7 letters and the \'apt wordplay\'. I shall sit and try to work out the associative answers for my own satisfaction but the solution doesn\'t require them. Quite a bit of tricky wordplay to understand as well.
No doubt I'm wrong or harsh (probably both), but I think that the preamble is inaccurate (fortunately it didn't spoil what was for me a thoroughly enjoyable puzzle) . I don't blame Hypnos for the preamble and its failings: these should have been remedied by the editors. There seem to have been a number of such infelicities of late, the most egregious being that for 4054 (where I believe that there are two possible solutions, distinguishable only by whimsy), unless you're persuaded that the church/steeple/tower exercise in clairvoyance was the more spectacular.
I'm grateful to Hypnos and the other setters who are achieving something that is beyond me, I'm also grateful to the editors for performing what must be a largely thankless task: it's because of their customary high standards that I feel acutely that they have nodded recently.
I'm grateful to Hypnos and the other setters who are achieving something that is beyond me, I'm also grateful to the editors for performing what must be a largely thankless task: it's because of their customary high standards that I feel acutely that they have nodded recently.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.