Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Listener 4103: Annual Turnover by Ragtag
87 Answers
Fairly straightforward debut by Ragtag this week. The basics of the theme we have seen in a listener a couple of years back as well as in the EV. I was wondering what the clashes had to do with it, but it's all confirmed in Chambers. I am surprised this aspect of the puzzle has not come up before.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by midazolam. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It never dawned on me that there is an ambiguity with the "symbol". It probably would have been better to say "the clashes need changing to a symbol and connected appropriately with lines". This representation in books etc is not "Robbie Williams" and so without the lines, as it is here, I can't see why it would be marked wrong using either symbol.
I'm sorry, I seem to have stirred a rare can of worms (or whatever the equivalent is in the context). It seems to me that the Chambers' definition of a symbol (an emblem ... that which by custom or convention represents something else) includes both the childish 'Robbie Williams' representation, which, 'by custom' represents what we are talking about, and the official 'conventional' representation which is 'simpler'. To reject either would be fearsomely unfair.
I never spotted the "L" either. It took me only a couple of minutes to work out that the grid can easily be made using largest, grume, dipole, items, tite, ten, pleura and reest. So I wonder why ragtag did not stick with it?
(These fake answers should not help solvers and if used will probably confuse more than anything)
(These fake answers should not help solvers and if used will probably confuse more than anything)
hmm - I notice that contrary to my instructions to the teenagers (what is new there?) the crossword has not actually been posted yet. I shall resist the the temptation to open it and replace the symbol with what, after this discussion, is more probably the intended one. I'll rely on RuthRobin's expectation of both being accepted.
Now here's an interesting conjecture. Spotting the possible modification at the top adds an extra clash, and an extra symbol, in very (very) roughly the right place too. If on the other hand, you also apply the other transformation to the top line, it ends up in exactly the right place. Doo doo doo doo...