Different folk in control. The BBC forums love to delete posts the admin simply disagree with. Whereas Clarkson is on trust not to go too far :-) by whoever runs the TV prog.
sorry misread that as this forum, apologies, but expect the BBC have any number of complaints and threatening to shoot someone might be construed as taking it a bit far. As to him, it's what he does, and anyone who has ever listened, watched him knows that it's his stock on trade. Sometime jesting, and sometime serious, but you never can tell.
I would only be upset if someone, whom I respected, came out with an opinion like he did. If you don't respect the guy why be bothered by anything he says?
I can't stand JC but for once I'm proud to back him (and really annoyed that he apologised, instead of standing up for his beliefs):
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15994290
boxy, I suppose your post at 0057 was aimed at brionon - but it could be aimed equally at Clarkson. It doesn't matter if he took it seriously; it might matter very much if someone else did. People on news-type programmes (as opposed to out-and-out comedy programmes) need to be a bit careful with their words.
Yeah, I understand what you're saying, jno, but it's the same as the stuff he spouts on Top Gear, nobody (IMO) gets their knickers in a twist about that, it's just JC.
sure, but that's a different audience. The Top Gear audience expects it of him; the One Show audience might not. Sort of like things you say in your own home don't necessarily work in someone else's.