Film, Media & TV1 min ago
Bad rules in sports.
22 Answers
Is there any rule or 'law' in any game or sport which you think illogical, unfair or just plain wrong? My two are the rule for the net cord in tennis; if it happens on a serve, but the ball is in, a 'let' is called but if that happens in open play it's just good, or bad, luck to the player; and rule about the dart out off the wire in darts; the shot might be a millimetre out from the bull or a treble, but it counts as a shot, just as if the player had missed the board altogether.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by FredPuli43. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I don't undertstand why servers in tennis get a second chance at all.
I'm sure when I was learning to be a football referee we were told that if a player takes a throw in and a team mate catches it it's not handball- it never happens but it seemed an odd rule.
If you take penalty during normal time and hit the post you can't follow up to knock the rebound in
I'm sure when I was learning to be a football referee we were told that if a player takes a throw in and a team mate catches it it's not handball- it never happens but it seemed an odd rule.
If you take penalty during normal time and hit the post you can't follow up to knock the rebound in
It annoys me when in football players are substituted in injury time, the 91st or 92nd minute for example.
I was at Fulham v Swansea last season and Swansea played very well and went 3-0 up, but had not used a substitute.
Near the end they said 3 minutes of injury time, and after about two minutes of those Swansea decided to make 3 substitutions all at the same time.
We all had to wait while each player came off and the new one came on, then after about 20 seconds more football the ref blew his whistle.
I would say no substitutions AT ALL for any reason (even injury) after 85 minutes.
I was at Fulham v Swansea last season and Swansea played very well and went 3-0 up, but had not used a substitute.
Near the end they said 3 minutes of injury time, and after about two minutes of those Swansea decided to make 3 substitutions all at the same time.
We all had to wait while each player came off and the new one came on, then after about 20 seconds more football the ref blew his whistle.
I would say no substitutions AT ALL for any reason (even injury) after 85 minutes.
The 'let' in tennis is an anachronism that should be got rid.
As for football, a simple and readily available solution is for time-keeping to be done by an official other than the referee, just as it is in rugby; the clock is stopped for things such as substitution and is also displayed for all to see - no more fergie time. At the higher levels of the sport if the technology (e.g. electronic scoreboards) is already there then make full use of it.
As for football, a simple and readily available solution is for time-keeping to be done by an official other than the referee, just as it is in rugby; the clock is stopped for things such as substitution and is also displayed for all to see - no more fergie time. At the higher levels of the sport if the technology (e.g. electronic scoreboards) is already there then make full use of it.
VHG
I agree about stoppage-time subs.
My solution to this is quite radical. I would set the number of subs for a league season at the start. This is currently 3/game in EPL = 114.
I would then let managers use them as they wish and when they are finished that's it. This would introduce an incentive to keep a positive balance to give more options in difficult games.
I agree about stoppage-time subs.
My solution to this is quite radical. I would set the number of subs for a league season at the start. This is currently 3/game in EPL = 114.
I would then let managers use them as they wish and when they are finished that's it. This would introduce an incentive to keep a positive balance to give more options in difficult games.
Bibble
Re timekeeping; I seem to remember a few years back in some of the televised matches the time the ball was in play was shown.
My recollection is that it was hardly ever more than 30 mins per half. If this was to become official then matches would get longer by about 30 mins or the playing time would have to be reduced.
Re timekeeping; I seem to remember a few years back in some of the televised matches the time the ball was in play was shown.
My recollection is that it was hardly ever more than 30 mins per half. If this was to become official then matches would get longer by about 30 mins or the playing time would have to be reduced.
Apparently you can be a member of a team that wins a cycling gold but not get one yourself.
http:// www.bel fasttel ...-tal ent-161 94752.h tml
http://
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.