Quizzes & Puzzles39 mins ago
Repetitive posters - why?
There are a couple of posters who inhabit law in various incarnations. The questions tend to be care home fee based or pension question based. All questions are variations on a theme of previous questions. A couple of "detectives" have them bang to rights every time.
My question in to that person - or those people. Why? You posted your question the first time, you had answers - why not continue with the same question (if you didn't like the answer) rather than starting up a new user name? Do you not realise that in posting the same question over and over you are taking up resources? For instance, I don't post on many of your questions anymore - thus you've lost the benefit of my advice (no benefit, I hear you say). But what is the point? If you disagree or you've a point to make why not come back in your original name rather than creating new names and new similar scenarios. Post answer on your original thread and sensible and knowledgable people will attempt to answer them.
If you've got a particularly challenging legal problem and you are looking for a different answer - just say and I am sure someone can point you in the right direction.
I am looking to factor, bednobs etc for some support here......
My question in to that person - or those people. Why? You posted your question the first time, you had answers - why not continue with the same question (if you didn't like the answer) rather than starting up a new user name? Do you not realise that in posting the same question over and over you are taking up resources? For instance, I don't post on many of your questions anymore - thus you've lost the benefit of my advice (no benefit, I hear you say). But what is the point? If you disagree or you've a point to make why not come back in your original name rather than creating new names and new similar scenarios. Post answer on your original thread and sensible and knowledgable people will attempt to answer them.
If you've got a particularly challenging legal problem and you are looking for a different answer - just say and I am sure someone can point you in the right direction.
I am looking to factor, bednobs etc for some support here......
Answers
I have enjoyed some of the conversation s, particularly with Brimoan, Granger99 and Holmes 123; there was some good banter and no malice- just the occasional 'nudge nudge, wink wink' from both sides. It was good natured and I'd be happy to continue in that vein. But it would be necessary I feel for him to 'come clean' so we could establish what the real...
23:32 Tue 30th Oct 2012
Hi Barmaid- I have just replied to your last post on the Insurance Excess thread.
I wish I knew. The poster may have had some bad experiences that he can't let go of. Maybe he is campaigning on behalf of friends. Maybe he just wants companionship through here and has only so many topics he can raise. or maybe he is just having a laugh with us.
Some of the tales are so unusual/bizarre they have to be taken with a pinch of salt. And the fact that he becomes a she and other key details change also make me wonder what is the case and what isn't.
I used to spend a lot of time researching things and helping until it became clear we were dealing with a serial poster using numerous names and answering his own threads, occasionally slipping up and signing in in the wrong name.
I'd prefer (if Ed is prepared to let him stay) for him to come clean and stick to one user name.
i hope he answers your question but I doubt it. The nearest we got was when he said once "the subject will keep coming up".
I wish I knew. The poster may have had some bad experiences that he can't let go of. Maybe he is campaigning on behalf of friends. Maybe he just wants companionship through here and has only so many topics he can raise. or maybe he is just having a laugh with us.
Some of the tales are so unusual/bizarre they have to be taken with a pinch of salt. And the fact that he becomes a she and other key details change also make me wonder what is the case and what isn't.
I used to spend a lot of time researching things and helping until it became clear we were dealing with a serial poster using numerous names and answering his own threads, occasionally slipping up and signing in in the wrong name.
I'd prefer (if Ed is prepared to let him stay) for him to come clean and stick to one user name.
i hope he answers your question but I doubt it. The nearest we got was when he said once "the subject will keep coming up".
"I'd prefer (if Ed is prepared to let him stay) for him to come clean and stick to one user name. "
I wholeheartedly agree. If he did so, he might find that I would be prepared to help him (for free!) rather than him having to post the same question in different guises several times over.
I'd really like him to come clean too. I get the impression that there is no malice, but its bloody annoying all the same.
I wholeheartedly agree. If he did so, he might find that I would be prepared to help him (for free!) rather than him having to post the same question in different guises several times over.
I'd really like him to come clean too. I get the impression that there is no malice, but its bloody annoying all the same.
I have enjoyed some of the conversations, particularly with Brimoan, Granger99 and Holmes 123; there was some good banter and no malice- just the occasional 'nudge nudge, wink wink' from both sides. It was good natured and I'd be happy to continue in that vein. But it would be necessary I feel for him to 'come clean' so we could establish what the real circumstances and issues are. I would then provide whatever help I could , confident that the help is genuinely wanted
I'd like to know how on earth you manage to suss these posters out! LOL
I never (maybe once or twice) see through this type of poster
I agree though, if it's harmless banter where is the harm?
After, there is usually some excellent information being put onto those threads that otherwise may get lost in the dark well that is the internet
And brimoan is one of them :(
I never (maybe once or twice) see through this type of poster
I agree though, if it's harmless banter where is the harm?
After, there is usually some excellent information being put onto those threads that otherwise may get lost in the dark well that is the internet
And brimoan is one of them :(
hi barmaid, while i fully support your point of view, today answering the insurance post was an abberation for me - i realised months ago that there was just no point in "outing" the person as they never acknowledge what they are doing, people don't read the posts "outing" them and answer them anyway, and quite frankly it just gets my back up when i see his/her posts and the people who are genuinely answering, not knowing the are being taken for a ride. Nowadays, i just report it and move on - it's much better for my sanity :)
I have come to the conclusion the poster will never acknowledge they are a pain in the bum, or even that they have more than 1 username, and i really find them a bit strange so now i just tend to stay away
I have come to the conclusion the poster will never acknowledge they are a pain in the bum, or even that they have more than 1 username, and i really find them a bit strange so now i just tend to stay away
Hi Barmaid- here are some of the sort of threads I think you are referring to.
Some people may have benefited from the information in there, although I think many of the scenarios are rather far-fetched. On the other hand a lot of posters have put a lot of effort into giving well researched and well thought out replies when it may be falling on deaf ears. This list just scratches the surface of what has been happening.
I should point out that the attached list was very easy to compile as it was simply copied from the list threads I've subscribed to.
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 57397.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 47015.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 83861.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 73978.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 80171.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 78990.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 32336.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 75650.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 76211.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 42483.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 08244.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 71528.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 02249.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 56812.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 51621.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 05765.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 50610.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 67493.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 64692.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 63365.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 61589.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 59229.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 73134.h tml
http:// www.the answerb .../Que stion11 57647.h tml
Is this the sort of thing you mean?
Clearly the poster is not put off by daily suspensions and keeps returning. Maybe we should just accept it and ignore it and leave others to post replies if they want to.
Some people may have benefited from the information in there, although I think many of the scenarios are rather far-fetched. On the other hand a lot of posters have put a lot of effort into giving well researched and well thought out replies when it may be falling on deaf ears. This list just scratches the surface of what has been happening.
I should point out that the attached list was very easy to compile as it was simply copied from the list threads I've subscribed to.
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
Is this the sort of thing you mean?
Clearly the poster is not put off by daily suspensions and keeps returning. Maybe we should just accept it and ignore it and leave others to post replies if they want to.
I have no idea why people would post untrue situations to be answered when there are enough unfair and true situations to go around for people to try to answer, the fact that information is free may have something to do with it, I spent nearly four years with the CAB and we had repeat time wasters there but at least we could see and identify them, some of them would wait several hours to ask the same question that they had previously had answered. Many people will just avoid answering questions they think are repeat questions or not serious situations and in doing so may ignore a genuine question which needs to be answered. If you just want to see people react to your untrue situation you should do something more useful as you may well be stopping a genuine question from being answered by someone prepared to research or use their knowledge and try to give helpful information.
Keep up the good work of identifying these people and remember free advice from Council is unheard of in much of the legal profession.
Keep up the good work of identifying these people and remember free advice from Council is unheard of in much of the legal profession.
-- answer removed --
Hi Barmaid- well, it seems you got a response from the poster to whom you were holding out the olive branch, but it seems he/she was simply intending to carry on as before. He responding on this thread, and to his own insurance excess thread, under yet another name.
I don't think there's much more I can add now, bednobs has set out her thoughts and others have contributed.
I don't think there's much more I can add now, bednobs has set out her thoughts and others have contributed.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.