Religion & Spirituality - What...
ChatterBank5 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by bernardo. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Your right Andi attraction is a facinating thing. I don't find many of todays young actors that attractive, Which is fine cos it wouldn't do for us all to have the same tastes.
Personally I find older, graggier faces like Tommy Lee Jones an attraction.
But having said that give me Hugh Jackman any day.YES SIREE.
JinxtheCat wrote:
I'd have Matt over Pitt any day!!!
I'd have Matt over me any day! (tee hee)
Lorcan wrote:
Maybe it's because you appraise Brad 'objectively.' I would suggest that opinions of whether fanciable or not are formed before evidence is sought. What I mean is that, finding Matt fanciable, you may search for evidence that he is. Contrarily, you may find yourself searcching for Brad's imperfections.
Hmmm... interesting theory :-) I was thinking about this question yesterday while I was watching "Mr and Mrs Smith". I was also thinking "If it were Matt Damon instead of Brad Pitt, would his gorgeousness distract me from the plot of the film?". I was actually looking for positive signs of Brad's attractiveness. He is (objectively) attractive but he does not "turn me on" (or whatever the phrase is).
kazzee69 wrote:
I have never found Brad Pitt attractive. I never even really cared about him until I saw him in FRIENDS, (I am a big FRIENDS fan) and I thought he seemed like a nice fun guy but still no attraction.
That was the only episode of "Friends" that I've ever watched(!). I watched it specifically to see Brad Pitt in it (I liked the audience's reaction when he appeared) and similarly it was entertaining but not sparkling.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.