Quizzes & Puzzles5 mins ago
How Far Should Our Collaboration Between Gchq And Nsa Go?
4 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-23 38886/O ur-onli ne-spyi ng-deal -US-pre vented- Olympic -terror -strike -says-H ague-de fends-c ollabor ation-G CHQ-NSA .html
Is the quest for safety from terrorism worth an invasion into our privacy?
Is the quest for safety from terrorism worth an invasion into our privacy?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It should remain within the law.
There are adequate provisions for the security service to monitor data these require warrents from the Home secretary.
I don't believe Theresa May would be shy in authorising them.
If there is a problem getting these warrants then that debate should be had.
We cannot have security services acting outside the law because they find following the law inconvenient.
That applies in the US and the UK- it sounds to me as if the NSA have shared data that they have obtained under the Prism program - which I suspect is illegal under US law.
I don't know whether we can blame our security forces for accepting this information as they didn't gather it, it is probably legal.
But the US need to put their house in order.
The touchstone for me is whether security forces have acted outside the law - the law is too restrictive is not an excuse - if they need more powers they have to ask for them and the law needs to be ammended
There are adequate provisions for the security service to monitor data these require warrents from the Home secretary.
I don't believe Theresa May would be shy in authorising them.
If there is a problem getting these warrants then that debate should be had.
We cannot have security services acting outside the law because they find following the law inconvenient.
That applies in the US and the UK- it sounds to me as if the NSA have shared data that they have obtained under the Prism program - which I suspect is illegal under US law.
I don't know whether we can blame our security forces for accepting this information as they didn't gather it, it is probably legal.
But the US need to put their house in order.
The touchstone for me is whether security forces have acted outside the law - the law is too restrictive is not an excuse - if they need more powers they have to ask for them and the law needs to be ammended
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.