ChatterBank5 mins ago
Baptism And Marriage
An ancestor was baptised in June 1895 - aged 29 - and married on Christmas Day of the same year. I was puzzled by the adult baptism, but someone suggested that she may have been baptised to allow her to be married in church. Is that a reasonable assumption, and was that a religious requirement at that time? Comments appreciated.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by jocon. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Hi Jocon, I would say that would be a reasonable assumption yes.
I wonder if the woman you mention might have been born in a non-religious country, or perhaps have been illegitimate and kept out of sight as a child (away from the church) and found that she had to become baptised to be with her beloved?
Or perhaps she was of another faith and had to convert to marry?
Do you know into which faith she was baptised?
All interesting stuff to dig into.. good luck :-)
I wonder if the woman you mention might have been born in a non-religious country, or perhaps have been illegitimate and kept out of sight as a child (away from the church) and found that she had to become baptised to be with her beloved?
Or perhaps she was of another faith and had to convert to marry?
Do you know into which faith she was baptised?
All interesting stuff to dig into.. good luck :-)
^^ By the way Christening / Baptism does not have to be done in a church or by a Vicar or Priest . In an emergency in can be done by anyone who is a confirmed member of the Church. In earlier days a baby who had not been Christened was said to be unable to enter Heaven on death, so a sick new born baby needed an 'emergency baptism' to ensure they were did not spend eternity in Purgatory .