ChatterBank16 mins ago
New President Sprouts Wings And Soars - Wouldn't You Say?
In his first week as President Donald J. Trump swept down from Valhalla and accomplished more than most presidents do in a lifetime.
Among his innumerable wonderful and admirable achievements:
• He signed an Executive Order to “secure the southern border of the United States through the immediate construction of a physical wall.”
• He threatened to cut federal funding to “sanctuary cities” that harbor illegal aliens who clean toilets, sell drugs, and rape women.
• He stabbed the Trans Pacific Partnership to death.
• He enacted an immediate federal hiring freeze.
• He called for a “major investigation” into voter fraud during the last election.
• He advanced plans for the Keystone and Dakota pipelines.
• He temporarily blocked all refugees from entering the United States for 120 days. He blocked Syrian refugees indefinitely and barred visa applicants from Iraq, Yemen, Libya, Iran, Somalia, and Sudan, thus sparing American citizens from a tremendous influx of body odor.
“It’s OK to praise Satan and Joseph Mengele—just don’t call a gay guy a ‘fruit.’”
• He won high holy hosannas from American labor-union chiefs.
• He met with British Prime Minister Theresa May, whereupon they winked at each other and whispered that they would make the Anglosphere great again.
It ain’t vainglorious if it’s great again!
Despite all these monumental achievements, the press attempted to deflect attention by focusing on the size of his inauguration crowd and showing pictures of crying Muslims.
Takimag
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.You do go on some weird websites. Here's where that was copied and pasted from:
http:// takimag .com/ar ticle/t he_week _that_p erished _takima g_janua ry_29_2 017#axz z4XX39W NZH
This is a right-wring publication filled with fairly nasty stuff. A lot of propaganda, not much in the way of humanity.
http://
This is a right-wring publication filled with fairly nasty stuff. A lot of propaganda, not much in the way of humanity.
Not sure an AB Editor should be insinuating right wing is nasty.
Either way The POTUS has achieved a lot already. I'm sure he will gain strength from the hows of the left and all those luvvies and the media who simply dont get how someone can operate outside the right-on liberal elite Establishment.
Hopefully there will be more to come, one thing is for sure the left cant accuse him of U-Turns and broken promises which i am pretty sure they would have done if he actually amended his policies to appease him.
Either way The POTUS has achieved a lot already. I'm sure he will gain strength from the hows of the left and all those luvvies and the media who simply dont get how someone can operate outside the right-on liberal elite Establishment.
Hopefully there will be more to come, one thing is for sure the left cant accuse him of U-Turns and broken promises which i am pretty sure they would have done if he actually amended his policies to appease him.
Must confess I was surprised that the Ed even knew of the site and was able to ID the op so quickly. I had never seen the site and have had a quick shuffty. A lot of it is laced with irony and obviously tongue in cheek in parts, a bit like the right wing version of the Canary I suppose. I have bookmarked it though and will have a read through some of the "articles" that are there. I did find the twitter accounts below the second page pretty weird reading I must say. Most of the comments seemed to be made by people who were obviously "bombed" (^_*)
I've been reading 'Taki' (Taki Theodorascopulos) in the high Life column of The Spectator for over 30 years and I admire and enjoy his witty incisive take on the world, you may read some of them on here;
http:// www.spe ctator. co.uk/a uthor/t aki/
He did not write that piece but as editor he would be sympathetic to what it contains, as will many millions of so-called 'right wing' sensible people.
http://
He did not write that piece but as editor he would be sympathetic to what it contains, as will many millions of so-called 'right wing' sensible people.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.