News3 mins ago
Foxhound Mod Vehicles 'keep Breaking Down'
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -414315 07
Speaking to the BBC in Iraq, an Army sergeant responsible for maintaining a fleet of Foxhounds said the vehicle was "a massive waste of money".
But the MOD say that there is nothing wrong.
So, who would you believe.....a Sergeant working in the thick of it, or a MOD wonk in Whitehall ?
Speaking to the BBC in Iraq, an Army sergeant responsible for maintaining a fleet of Foxhounds said the vehicle was "a massive waste of money".
But the MOD say that there is nothing wrong.
So, who would you believe.....a Sergeant working in the thick of it, or a MOD wonk in Whitehall ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.//But the MOD say that there is nothing wrong. //
What the MOD spokesman said.
The Ministry of Defence said Foxhound "has dealt with the demanding conditions in Iraq" and was "keeping soldiers safe"
"The MoD says the UOR programme has "saved countless soldiers' lives" in Iraq and Afghanistan and that there are no plans to sell the Foxhound."
Source of Beep Beep See "report".
"The sergeant, who did not want to be named, said the vehicles keep overheating."
Just another deliberate contrived Beep Beep See mischief making exercise.
What the MOD spokesman said.
The Ministry of Defence said Foxhound "has dealt with the demanding conditions in Iraq" and was "keeping soldiers safe"
"The MoD says the UOR programme has "saved countless soldiers' lives" in Iraq and Afghanistan and that there are no plans to sell the Foxhound."
Source of Beep Beep See "report".
"The sergeant, who did not want to be named, said the vehicles keep overheating."
Just another deliberate contrived Beep Beep See mischief making exercise.
Eccles...read the link. The Foxhound was first deployed in 2012, 3 years after you say that combat troops were withdrawn from Afghanistan.
Another quote from the link that you may have missed :::
"Foxhounds are used in Afghanistan and Iraq to transport soldiers who are training local forces and providing force protection"
Another quote from the link that you may have missed :::
"Foxhounds are used in Afghanistan and Iraq to transport soldiers who are training local forces and providing force protection"
//Source of Beep Beep See "report".
"The sergeant, who did not want to be named, said the vehicles keep overheating."//
As I said. Source....some soldiers.(a bit like Trigger's birth certificate)
Therefore not verified. A story to cause mischief, paid for by the licence payer, to discredit a Government Ministry. Who gives the go ahead for such sly propaganda? Minitrue once again.
Don't know about Foxhounds overheating(chasing too many foxes?) but some of our posters certainly do. :))
"The sergeant, who did not want to be named, said the vehicles keep overheating."//
As I said. Source....some soldiers.(a bit like Trigger's birth certificate)
Therefore not verified. A story to cause mischief, paid for by the licence payer, to discredit a Government Ministry. Who gives the go ahead for such sly propaganda? Minitrue once again.
Don't know about Foxhounds overheating(chasing too many foxes?) but some of our posters certainly do. :))
"Eccles...read the link. The Foxhound was first deployed in 2012, 3 years after you say that combat troops were withdrawn from Afghanistan."
Eccles put "Combat troops withdrew from Iraq in 2009, three years before this vehicle entered service."
Come on Mikey, stop rewriting the script to suit yourself.
Eccles put "Combat troops withdrew from Iraq in 2009, three years before this vehicle entered service."
Come on Mikey, stop rewriting the script to suit yourself.
Mikey, please read my post properly!
As Purdue has said there is a whole lot of backstory to this that the press and general public will not be privy to. The complexities of going from a USUR to in service is rapid and with risk as a consequence. History shows this time and time over.
I suppose though we could have just kept the Snatch LRs in service though until we were absolutely sure that it's replacement was completely faultless.
As Purdue has said there is a whole lot of backstory to this that the press and general public will not be privy to. The complexities of going from a USUR to in service is rapid and with risk as a consequence. History shows this time and time over.
I suppose though we could have just kept the Snatch LRs in service though until we were absolutely sure that it's replacement was completely faultless.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.