Having a bit of a punt this morning with Answerbank.
From the OP headlines I am predicting the answers of my fellow posters on. Not word for word so much as the rhetoric they give, in response. Which side they come down on by either agreeing or disagreeing with the post etc
Actually sometimes you do sort of know what words they will use because they are stock answers but we do get a surprise sometimes.
For instance I can predict with some confidence who advocates free stuff paid by everyone else and who advocates providing for yourself with help when needed by the state.
From opinions on Trump, gender equality, welfare and politics.
This isn't a dig at anyone or any anyone's opinions. It is that some things are so noticeable that, although I still do, I am cutting back on posting because we each say the same thing over and over again.
Cassa....I try to maintain a consistency about such matters.
For instance, I have always voted Labour, since the very first time I was able to cast my vote. Some people switch their vote from Election to Election.
As regards to Trump, I have always regarded him a loud-mouthed, bigoted ignoramus and I see no reason to change that opinion now.
I kind of do the same cassa. If its not a practical type question, I will often decide whether to go look or not based on who posted the question or who I see has answered.
I like to play 'Newspaper Bingo'. I read through the headlines and decide which AB is likely to post about a particular topic......I'm rarely disappointed.
There's a certain person on here who goes on, sometimes at length, on matters of the EU, but their answers demonstrate their frail grasp of the situation. And sometimes a frail grasp of our language.
jackthehat
I like to play 'Newspaper Bingo'. I read through the headlines and decide which AB is likely to post about a particular topic......I'm rarely disappointed.
Much the same... only I also include which ABers will have an Arsène Wenger period and totally ignore a thread.