I love Kevin Spacey's acting, he is a rare and massive talent, but if he's a rapist / sex offender then he needs dealing with to the full letter of the law. Should we separate criminals talents from their crimes, yes probably, but are we likely to, no and I think for their victims that's the right decision. That being said no-one is going to slash all the Caravaggios are they?
I have just been listening to a piece about him on Radio 4, and the presenter suggested that all the previous series of "House of Cards" should be withdrawn by Netflicks. ( I haven't seen the programs, by the way )
People make excuses for the rich and famous even if they are guilty of having committed a crime.... Why should they continue as before if they are guilty? IMO whatever they are brilliant at....once named, shamed and proven guilty...they should be history....and their names and career be buried forever.
So he groped a boy years ago who was also homosexual and the self serving little rat and failed actor has done this to him, but Kevin Spacey is one of the true greats, take a load of this and remember;
ummmm, yes I know that Glitter was a pedo in every sense of the word but is an (alledged) sexual advance against a 14 year old (and others now coming forward) any less a reason to want to see the back of them, if true?
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.