Film, Media & TV0 min ago
Would The Patrician, Rees-Mogg, Have Been Within His Rights...
28 Answers
...if he'd taken a horsewhip to the protester who verbally abused him in front of his children?
https:/
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
He and his wife are ridiculous to allow their children to witness the behaviour of that man. Parents, move your children to safety close your door, or was the publicity just too good to turn down. I felt very sad/angry for those children. Then they parade the nanny!!!!!!!! . They are so awful they made the royals appear normal !!!!!
They weren't parading their children . It looked as if they were just returning home. What business is it of anyone's how much the nanny gets paid? She's been with the family 50 years and looked very happy . She should have socked that loud mouthed idiot .To their credit none of the family rose to the bait . This was just plain harassment by a loud mouthy idiot. However taking a horse-whip to him would not have been the answer.I am surprised that the policeman didn't do something even if it was to just move the man away.
I am at a loss to explain how New Judge can say he is within his rights and then he is breaking the law
I blame legal aid
Watch Fear thy Neighbour ( sudduv judge judy on meff - they always shoot each other - and words alone are never enough [to be a sufficient defence of self defence] )
OK that was guns - horse whips pro bono - I mean "fortiori but less",
whatever that is in Latin - ceteris paribus
[altho one of my frenz struck out pre emptively and successfully ran a self defence, defence. we never went out drinking with him again]
I blame legal aid
Watch Fear thy Neighbour ( sudduv judge judy on meff - they always shoot each other - and words alone are never enough [to be a sufficient defence of self defence] )
OK that was guns - horse whips pro bono - I mean "fortiori but less",
whatever that is in Latin - ceteris paribus
[altho one of my frenz struck out pre emptively and successfully ran a self defence, defence. we never went out drinking with him again]
I think one is only allowed to abuse 'patricians' and not the plebbish slobs, it would be interested to know who the moron-with-mic was, I would expect him to have a similar back-ground to Rees-Mogg, they usually do. As for the question, yes he would, but look at the odium against Prescott who rightly retaliated when he was physically assaulted. One's rights seem to increase with one's abuse.
Haha. Horsewhip? Bit of a loaded "retaliation weapon of choice" there Sandyman. He would get away with a Shillelagh though, no doubt.
"A man is likely to mind his own business when it is worth minding. When it is not, he takes his mind off his own meaningless affairs by minding other people’s business."
Eric Hoffer.
"A man is likely to mind his own business when it is worth minding. When it is not, he takes his mind off his own meaningless affairs by minding other people’s business."
Eric Hoffer.
The OED defines patrician as “A person of noble birth or rank, an aristocrat; a person of high social status, esp. one from an established wealthy family; a member of the upper classes.”
So (excepting the noble birth b@llsh1t) Reesmogg might qualify.
And it occurs that if he HAD been up before the beak it wouldn’t have been our resident masquerader, but a real one.
So (excepting the noble birth b@llsh1t) Reesmogg might qualify.
And it occurs that if he HAD been up before the beak it wouldn’t have been our resident masquerader, but a real one.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.