Donate SIGN UP

Only In America

Avatar Image
Canary42 | 09:35 Wed 22nd Jan 2020 | News
26 Answers
Facing possible jail for going topless in own home. Her step-children saw her breasts - shock horror.

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/judge-deals-blow-woman-charged-232758804.html

But it's OK to put a narcissistic reprobate, who's boasted of groping, in charge of the whole country.

Good to see they've got their priorities right.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 26rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Avatar Image
Canary - Trying to minimise one situation by maximising another is not a valid tool of debate. One situation is not mitigated by another situation being seen as a worse one, that is absolutely not how the law works.
09:40 Wed 22nd Jan 2020
This is bizarre. The laws talk about "public" nudity. She was in her own home?
Canary - Trying to minimise one situation by maximising another is not a valid tool of debate.

One situation is not mitigated by another situation being seen as a worse one, that is absolutely not how the law works.
I think canary’s comment about Trump is just an ironic aside, rather than an attempt to interpret law
Can't see story due to the demand from Verizon to spy on me.
I don't see this as being particularly wrong; unless accompanying behaviour was outrageous to children.
Talk about hypocrisy, this kind of stupidity from the worlds biggest porn producer.
"I think canary’s comment about Trump is just an ironic aside, rather than an attempt to interpret law"

I think Canary's comment about Trump was a pathetic way to crowbar his hatred of him into a thread.
She was deliberately showing her breasts to make a feminist point. Her step children did not want to see them. It's not as if they walked in to her bedroom or the bathroom and surprised her whilst she was bathing or getting dressed.
"When her husband’s three children, ages 9 through 13, walked in, she “explained she considers herself a feminist and wanted to make a point that everybody should be fine with walking around their house or elsewhere with skin showing,” her lawyers said in court documents.

Buchanan was charged with three counts of misdemeanor lewdness involving a child in February. It came after child welfare officials began an investigation involving the kids that wasn’t related to Buchanan.

The children’s mother reported the topless incident because she was “alarmed,” authorities said."

It is interesting to compare how extreme moral/religious/cultural/national obsessions bring about situations that are difficult for others to fathom, or simply to gape/laugh/agonise over in disbelief. One can put oneself in the place of people from the USA, the UK, China, Japan, Pakistan each looking at some curious event/behaviour in one of the other countries - how it is shaped has a local absurdity built into it, that is it is not absurd to those living in the place but absurd to everyone else.
How would you feel about a man deliberately exposing himself in front of his stepdaughters?
Spice rack has a very good point. If a man did the same there would be a National outrage. Double standards here I think. And in your own home or not to do it in front of other people’s children is an absolute no no.

But that’s the all encompassing left for you. Accept me, what I think and what I do at all costs or you will be cancelled by the woke brigade.

I don’t wonder around my house nude. Well only across the two feet between my bedroom and the bathroom perhaps. But to be honest that’s mostly because I don’t want to frighten the cat.
Another Trump bashing thread from Canary I see.
CAC - // Talk about hypocrisy, this kind of stupidity from the worlds biggest porn producer. //

I refer you to the allocated Best Answer.
Spicerack - // How would you feel about a man deliberately exposing himself in front of his stepdaughters? //

Clearly that is not a valid comparison.

Firstly, breasts are not genitalia, so accurate comparison would be a man walking around shirtless.

Secondly, although not uniformly seen as acceptable in the way that a topless man is acceptable in American, and indeed a lot of the civilised world accepts a shirtless man - a topless woman is seen as acceptable by large numbers of world cultures, whereas nowhere in the Western World is a man's genitalia on view seen as acceptable.
// … nowhere in the Western World is a man's genitalia on view seen as acceptable. //

I would qualify that - exempting designated nudist camps, beaches, and sectioned areas.
Men and women is the same, get with the programme, daddyo.
Ah, it's a 'free the nipple' thing eh.
Unsure I can get worked up about it. The father had presumably already set house rules prior.
Spicerack - // Men and women is the same, get with the programme, daddyo. //

Except where they'd not, sonnyo.
^Lol, that ain't even English, pop.
//I would qualify that - exempting designated nudist camps, beaches, and sectioned areas. //

and many art galleries, museums,parks throughout Europe.

1 to 20 of 26rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Only In America

Answer Question >>