Donate SIGN UP

Guidance, Rules Or Law?

Avatar Image
diddlydo | 14:40 Sun 20th Dec 2020 | ChatterBank
21 Answers
Can somebody please give a definitive answer? Boris's "rules" - are they actually enshrined in law at the moment or does that require a vote in the House of Commons? It makes a big difference if they're not legally enforceable!
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 21rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by diddlydo. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
the police are on the case

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/dec/20/police-to-stop-people-fleeing-new-covid-tier-4-areas-hancock-says

Though I don't actually know if that answers your question.
not law as far as i can see.
They are law. The legislation is in the form of a "Statutory Instrument" which is a sort of addition to primary legislation which has already been passed by Parliament. I always like to have a glance over the actual legislation because very often what is churned out in the media is misleading or simply incorrect. Unsurprisingly, since this new strain of virus (which is allegedly the reason for the cancellation of the Christmas relaxations) crept up on us so suddenly yesterday, the legislation was not available online last night. I'll have a look for it later.
Of course until the SI is signed by the appropriate Minister they do not form the law and the police have no business enforcing it.

I've just found it and it came into force at 7am this morning.
wonder if anyone has noticed apart from you NJ
Question Author
So why then are a considerable number of back benchers asking for parliament to be recalled so they can vote on it?
Because in a properly functioning democratic society, a law which confines people to their homes for all but a limited number of reasons, prevents people travelling about the country and closes vast swathes of the economy should be discussed and voted on by our representatives. The PM will be quick to recall Parliament if he wants them to swiftly approve any sell-out (sorry "deal") he agrees with the EU (after giving them 15 minutes to digest the 600 pages, naturally) but seems reluctant to do so before imposing Draconian measures on the population's freedom. But of course the "new variant" crept up on us so quickly and without notice that there wasn't time for any of those niceties before they all packed up for their Christmas sojourn.
Statutory Instrument is correct but it can be challenged by a majority in the House.
From the new Regs,

"In accordance with section 45R of the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984, the Secretary of State is of the opinion that, by reason of urgency, it is necessary to make this instrument
without a draft having been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament."
Corbyloon. Isn't it about time you changed your ID, or do you weep at the memory of the discredited anti-semite?
NJ is of course CORRECT
and should - nay must! - get best answy for the best answer
BUT.....
the true correct answer that these rules are backed by legislation and then varied within narrow limits by and SI - - statutory instrument

has fallen foul of the past when the words in the SI didnt match the wording on the charge
so the first batch ( only ) of the £1000 fixed penalties were - - - withdrawn. Oh Blappy do!

this doesnt mean that when mr plod sticks a doo-dah on YOU instead of tasering you - that YOURS will be withdrawn.

think of the hammersmith junction that nets £29 000 parking fines per annum.

and as a good Roman Cafflic - the virus hasnt changed - altho the colour of the paper on which the fines are printed may have - so 1' do what you think is good for you and your family

[I am one of the 20% whose crime wasnt recorded. No surprise: they didnt show any interest at the time. Or my neighbour. or my other neighbour, or the first neighbour again, second time or .....or]
Only a guess, but I doubt Corbyn has anything to do to TCL’s username .
"it is necessary to make this instrument
without a draft having been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament."

yeah I thought the MPs had shifted their arrisses to more salubrious climes - you cant blame them:
stay in Lundy and DDDDIIIIIIEEEEE!


Corbyloon. Isn't it about time you changed your ID, or do you weep at the memory of the discredited anti-semite? - - - eek TTT speak
concerns Corbyn - bless I suppose

NJ was very anodyne = dont worry folks - parliament is functioning as it should - a statutory instument has been laid before My Lord Speaker and also the fella in the funny hat, and the other one with the high voice. the one I can never stand

and we find by rule 5 it would have done but hasnt because there is an emergency on rule 6 but may be next week ( rule 7 )

well spotted ABers !
"Corbyloon. Isn't it about time you changed your ID, or do you weep at the memory of the discredited anti-semite? "

A profound apology is due from the poster of this nonsense - TCL's username is entirely derived from the proud steel town of Corby.
I only hope Plod did not penalise anybody between midnight and 7am this morning. The BBC "guidance" suggested that the new rules took effect from 00:01am today. I think Mr Johnson said the same in his "address to the nation" though I couldn't be sure as I try, as much as possible, to avoid listening to his waffle. However, the Statutory Instrument did not come into force until 7am this morning:

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/1611/pdfs/uksi_20201611_en.pdf

Mind you, that same document also states it was laid before Parliament tomorrow. But I suppose when you have a Prime Minister who cannot accurately calculate 28 days from 5th November you have to expect a few anomalies.
Not wanting to start yet another thread about tiers and Covid SK if Diddly doesn't mind
Ireland
France
Belgium,
Italy
The Netherlands
Austria
Germany

All suspended flights to the UK
SK? Dunno how thst got in there :0/
And Bulgaria now
PAIGNTONIAN, I've been rumbled!!!!

I joined in 2005, looked ten years into the future, recognised that folk would be talking about Jeremy Corbyn and mis-spelt his surname to throw folk of the scent.

You're too smart for me...
Well returned Corby :-)

1 to 20 of 21rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Guidance, Rules Or Law?

Answer Question >>