It seems a rare thing for the procedures of a court to provide such light-hearted entertainment for the general public.
I can't think of another one. Can you?
That's the difference, there's pain and hurt in the Depp case. Wagatha is frothy, little more than the clash of two egos with a lot more money than sense.
The problem with the Depp/Heard case is that no-one knows if either/both of them are acting. Though i suspect both are actually acting their socks off:-/
I think it's a sad indictment of our modern society, than nonsense like this is caused by social media, and it's now entertainment for the 'social media' generation.
I'd bet that the majority of people who find this tedious and pointless are over fifty!!
I think you’re right, Andy.
I haven’t been following either case too closely but I’ve seen pics of Amber Heard in which she seems to massively overacting.
With the silly women with more cash than brain cells, I really can’t tell them apart. I had originally thought it was Varney with the medi-boot, but it’s the other one, apparently.
I found it amusing to start with; now it is making me cringe as to how stupid someone can be to say that they had no choice but to bring this action to uphold their reputation undoubtedly in the knowledge that their reputation would be trashed whatever the outcome. The only winners will be the lawyers. I don't imagine anyone is going to be too pally with Jamie in the changing rooms from hereon in either.
'I'm with barmaid on this - how can they be so stupid'
It is amazing isnt it. Have you ever spoken to one of these wags? I have as one of my sil grew up with a footballer so at his wedding. I wont name them obviously but it really wasn't a conversation at all.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.