On the Blink?

[Aquagility]

Does anyone else keep bringing up posts dating back to 2004?

[JoolsTwo]

No! This happened before a few months ago, but I am ok at the moment.

[Alibobs]

My AB is fine today but had the same problems as JimJools a couple of months ago

[paulineward]

Hi Aquagility...been busy for a few days decorating!!!
I've had similar problems recently, I have to 'refresh' each time I log on, and then it takes me way back. Not quite as far as 2004, but I have to go off line and back on to get up to date info.
Hope you are well....have you been busy?

[Ont-ice]

Not with the year, but recently with time. If I answer a question at say, 2000 Canadian time which is actually - until the end of this month - midnight UK time, I can see a timed answer of anything from 1300 to 1500 hours GMT.

[Aquagility]

Hi! Pauline. No, not busy, just excommunicated! See thes link
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/Quizzes-and-Puz zles/Question382373.html

[Ont-ice]

Forgive me for sounding quite stupid, Aquagility but does it mean that if I were capable of answering 3 questions in 5 minutes I would be banned from the site?
If so, may I answer 2 questions in 5 minutes or even 4 questions in 5 minutes? Why the magic 3?
It is/was my understanding that if I knew the answer to a question or to questions (plural) then I was free to answer the question or questions (plural) regardless of the number of answers I gave or the time period involved. Have you been given a sane explanation for your being banned?

[paulineward]

This has happened before Aquagility. It is absolutely ridiculous! So is having an edotor who can do that and yet NOT reply to e-mails!
Keep your chin up! We are all with you!
Pauline x

[Aquagility]

According to the editor's email, it means precisely that, Ont-ice. Another email, from Technical, just said I had been suspended "for breaking the rules". But I can't find any such rule. I have asked for clarification. Anyhow, I have now been 'un-suspended'.

Bless you , Pauline. I know who my friends are. :o)