News0 min ago
Soldier Compensation. AB Guess.
25 Answers
Of recent months we have heard that soldies who have lost limbs, eye sight, loss of motor function etc have been given paltry compensation claims by both the MoD and our vicious government.
We have seen Gurkhas given p!ss poor pension rights, some refused British entry and they have basically been lied to.
These people, whatever your opinion on foreign occupation, have put their own personal safety behind that our country. That is a fact which can not be argued against.
My point................
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_yorksh ire/7193843.stm
How much do you think this hard faced, trying-to-be pretty foul, wanna-dick badly, lezza dyke of the the vilist kind will get???
I am willing to lay down my house as collateral that she will receive more in "an undisclosed settlement" that some poor sod who is in a wheelchair for the rest of his life.
If you read the article and the historic links she received a few text messages and a few unwanted advances. Nothing major really. She has seen NO action, and is already reaped loads of money off our cash strapped MoD.
Yes, sexual discrimination is not always a good thing and she may have a case but it makes me sick to the back teeth.
This filthy lezza chose to be in a male orientated proffession, what does she expect? She has hardly been raped or anything.
Also I have nothing against peoples sexuality. But there is no place for carpet-munching lezzas in our armed forces.
I hope she gets sweet FA and falls in a vat of acid. That will wipe the smirk off her filthy dyke face.
So ABer's any guess what she will receive or am I again over-reacting?
We have seen Gurkhas given p!ss poor pension rights, some refused British entry and they have basically been lied to.
These people, whatever your opinion on foreign occupation, have put their own personal safety behind that our country. That is a fact which can not be argued against.
My point................
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_yorksh ire/7193843.stm
How much do you think this hard faced, trying-to-be pretty foul, wanna-dick badly, lezza dyke of the the vilist kind will get???
I am willing to lay down my house as collateral that she will receive more in "an undisclosed settlement" that some poor sod who is in a wheelchair for the rest of his life.
If you read the article and the historic links she received a few text messages and a few unwanted advances. Nothing major really. She has seen NO action, and is already reaped loads of money off our cash strapped MoD.
Yes, sexual discrimination is not always a good thing and she may have a case but it makes me sick to the back teeth.
This filthy lezza chose to be in a male orientated proffession, what does she expect? She has hardly been raped or anything.
Also I have nothing against peoples sexuality. But there is no place for carpet-munching lezzas in our armed forces.
I hope she gets sweet FA and falls in a vat of acid. That will wipe the smirk off her filthy dyke face.
So ABer's any guess what she will receive or am I again over-reacting?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bewlay Bros. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
To answer your question, the Daily Telegraph reckons �400k.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml =/news/2008/01/17/nlesbian117.xml
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml =/news/2008/01/17/nlesbian117.xml
FACT: When you sign up tot he army (or any armed force) you expect to put your life on the line
FACT: when you sign up to any job you do not expect to be treated differently on account of your sexuality etc or bullied by a more senior member of staff - in fact it is illegal if this happens.
She is therefore entitled to more compensation than someone who loses a life. (not my rules but then I am not stupid enough to join the army)
FACT: when you sign up to any job you do not expect to be treated differently on account of your sexuality etc or bullied by a more senior member of staff - in fact it is illegal if this happens.
She is therefore entitled to more compensation than someone who loses a life. (not my rules but then I am not stupid enough to join the army)
Fact: She has never put her life on the line
Fact: she was NOT treated differently due to her sexuality. If she was a clean hetrosexual as opposed to a filthy wh0re-like dyke, she still would have had the advances. Nature of the beast, right or wrong. Yes the NCO needs to be addressed, do not get me wrong, but this piece of fish-smelling foulness deserves little more than the drippings from the my nose.
She is foul and a money grabbing, man-hating piece of dog vomit.
Fact: she was NOT treated differently due to her sexuality. If she was a clean hetrosexual as opposed to a filthy wh0re-like dyke, she still would have had the advances. Nature of the beast, right or wrong. Yes the NCO needs to be addressed, do not get me wrong, but this piece of fish-smelling foulness deserves little more than the drippings from the my nose.
She is foul and a money grabbing, man-hating piece of dog vomit.
. But there is no place for carpet-munching lezzas in our armed forces.
I take it minter that you mean there is no place for females in the Armed Forces?
I.E:
Chefs,
I.T Operatives
Clerks
Medics
Postal, Courier
Radio/Signal Operatives
Stores Personell
For someone who has never served a day, nay even one minute in the Army, Navy of Air Force even your limited ignorance is staggering.
End of
I take it minter that you mean there is no place for females in the Armed Forces?
I.E:
Chefs,
I.T Operatives
Clerks
Medics
Postal, Courier
Radio/Signal Operatives
Stores Personell
For someone who has never served a day, nay even one minute in the Army, Navy of Air Force even your limited ignorance is staggering.
End of
"I have nothing against peoples sexuality"
"hard faced, trying-to-be pretty foul, wanna-dick badly lezza of thre viilist kind"
"This filthy lezza"
"no place for carpet munnching lezzas in our armed forces"
"that will wipe the smile off her filthy dyke face"
and the pick of the bunch
"If she was a clean heterosexual as opposed to a filthy wh0re like dyke"
Have you perhaps had a relationship where the lady in question ran off with another woman? Got to you a bit did it?
I don't think that compensation for sexual discrimination of the type described in the article should be as high as �400k, but the fact is that you go to work and expect to be treated the same as everyone else regardless of your gender or sexuality. Yes, even in the armed forces. And she's not making the compensation rules up either. She's hardly waltzed up to Gordon Brown and demanded that she gets more money than a soldier in a wheelchair, so your homophobic bile is directed entirely at the wrong place. Get over yourself.
"hard faced, trying-to-be pretty foul, wanna-dick badly lezza of thre viilist kind"
"This filthy lezza"
"no place for carpet munnching lezzas in our armed forces"
"that will wipe the smile off her filthy dyke face"
and the pick of the bunch
"If she was a clean heterosexual as opposed to a filthy wh0re like dyke"
Have you perhaps had a relationship where the lady in question ran off with another woman? Got to you a bit did it?
I don't think that compensation for sexual discrimination of the type described in the article should be as high as �400k, but the fact is that you go to work and expect to be treated the same as everyone else regardless of your gender or sexuality. Yes, even in the armed forces. And she's not making the compensation rules up either. She's hardly waltzed up to Gordon Brown and demanded that she gets more money than a soldier in a wheelchair, so your homophobic bile is directed entirely at the wrong place. Get over yourself.
I have to take issue with you Bewlay.................on the 'hard-faced trying to be pretty comment'.
I think she's really quite tasty - not dissimilar to Victoria Smurfitt who I think is absolutely gorgeous.
I would, given the opportunity. Twice. (not one after the other you understand, I've reached my late 30's and can't go again for at least an hour nowadays. Age is a bitch).
I think she's really quite tasty - not dissimilar to Victoria Smurfitt who I think is absolutely gorgeous.
I would, given the opportunity. Twice. (not one after the other you understand, I've reached my late 30's and can't go again for at least an hour nowadays. Age is a bitch).
FACT: when you sign up to any job you do not expect to be treated differently on account of your sexuality
FACT: Females are constantly treated more favourably in all walks of life.
FACT: In the forces they are never asked to fight on the front line.
FACT: When employed in a manual situation, they are not asked to take on any task that a male could manage on his own with no problem, a male colleague is generally ask to "give her a hand"
FACT: Females are more likley to receive much lenient sentences from the courts.
FACT: The female Sailor in the Iranian waters boat fiasco was treated much more favourable than her male companions.
Equallity of the sexes is obviously a good thing, but like most things these days the pendulum of balance has swung too far, in favour of the female.
These over the top compansation awards are a prime example. We have recently heard of the civillian female Royal Air Force clerk who was awarded a very large sum, for a wrist injury.
The following case is also a prime example, put yourself in this business man's shoes. Would you now employ a female of child bearing age, when in the end it could cost you your very livelihood?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles /news/news.html?in_article_id=506550&in_page_i d=1770
Regarding Oneeyedvic's post:
She is therefore entitled to more compensation than someone who loses a life. (not my rules but then I am not stupid enough to join the army
What can one say? It is good that some choose to join the Army, just as it is good that some choose to be Policemen, Ambulance personal, Fire Fighters, Nurses, Doctors etc, etc.
Let us hope that such as Oneeye does
FACT: Females are constantly treated more favourably in all walks of life.
FACT: In the forces they are never asked to fight on the front line.
FACT: When employed in a manual situation, they are not asked to take on any task that a male could manage on his own with no problem, a male colleague is generally ask to "give her a hand"
FACT: Females are more likley to receive much lenient sentences from the courts.
FACT: The female Sailor in the Iranian waters boat fiasco was treated much more favourable than her male companions.
Equallity of the sexes is obviously a good thing, but like most things these days the pendulum of balance has swung too far, in favour of the female.
These over the top compansation awards are a prime example. We have recently heard of the civillian female Royal Air Force clerk who was awarded a very large sum, for a wrist injury.
The following case is also a prime example, put yourself in this business man's shoes. Would you now employ a female of child bearing age, when in the end it could cost you your very livelihood?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles /news/news.html?in_article_id=506550&in_page_i d=1770
Regarding Oneeyedvic's post:
She is therefore entitled to more compensation than someone who loses a life. (not my rules but then I am not stupid enough to join the army
What can one say? It is good that some choose to join the Army, just as it is good that some choose to be Policemen, Ambulance personal, Fire Fighters, Nurses, Doctors etc, etc.
Let us hope that such as Oneeye does
It wouldn't cost him his livelihood if he wasn't being an illegal t0sser. If women have all the advantages, why do men earn more and occupy more top positions? Surely it would be the other way around
What is your question Bewley? Meglet suggested the award according to the Telegraph, and I think you're over-reacting.
Lord knows we need to look after our troops better than we currently do, but that's a bit of seperate issue and not to be juxtaposed with this story
What is your question Bewley? Meglet suggested the award according to the Telegraph, and I think you're over-reacting.
Lord knows we need to look after our troops better than we currently do, but that's a bit of seperate issue and not to be juxtaposed with this story
There's always room and jobs for women in the Armed Forces, but, I may be a bit of a Dinasaur here, I believe, unless its an emergency situation, there should be no place for women in the fighting front line.
Apologies Wardy, not answered your question, just thought i'd put my twopenn'th in.
Also, to win the lottery, just sue for racial or sex discrimination, jackpot almost every time.
Apologies Wardy, not answered your question, just thought i'd put my twopenn'th in.
Also, to win the lottery, just sue for racial or sex discrimination, jackpot almost every time.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.