ChatterBank5 mins ago
do you condone these peoples behaviour PART 2 ?�
15 Answers
HateTheApe
Fri 03/04/09
21:40 Legend will be having virgin pie deep fried in haggis batter
Nobby will be having flatfish,on account of his ironed faced wife
and knono will be having 12 year old salmon..............as thats the average age of the nonces conqueststs.........................
puddicat
Fri 03/04/09
21:42 pmsl ape
___________________________________---
dot.hawkes
Sat 04/04/09
00:22 go away legend now you are stalking me, you're both just plain creepy
dot.hawkes
Sat 04/04/09
00:31 FAO Knobs and leg :definition from the urban dictionary:
internet stalker
A (usually) tragic male in his late 30s - 40s who spends all his free time hiding from reality whilst he chases girls/women using Internet chat rooms. Will often have deep seated emotional problems and possible peadophile tendencies
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by legendis.god. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.My advice to you legend is the same as that I would give to anyone on this site who is receiving abuse:- report it to the Ed or ignore it.
If you know it is untrue why let words on a screen from "people" that you do not know upset you.
Do not respond and I wager that they may carry on baiting you (as you also do to others which you know is true) however if you ignore them then they will not get what they want i.e a reaction.
I realise that my advice may "fall on deaf ears" but is given any way.
If you know it is untrue why let words on a screen from "people" that you do not know upset you.
Do not respond and I wager that they may carry on baiting you (as you also do to others which you know is true) however if you ignore them then they will not get what they want i.e a reaction.
I realise that my advice may "fall on deaf ears" but is given any way.
doesn't he play the victim really really well, does anyone wonder why i posted the line
dot.hawkes
Sat 04/04/09
00:22 go away legend now you are stalking me, you're both just plain creepy
Could it be because knobby and legend kept posting rubbish on any thread i started or got involved in that had nothing to do with the subject under debate?
Anyone wonder why I went onto google and googled 'cyberstalker'?
Anyone wonder why I copied and pasted three very large pieces of research into the subject?
Anyone wonder how Legend and a few of his lamebrain followers could decide that i had actually commissioned, researched, analysed, verified typed and published the thesis myself in the space of 10 seconds?
Anyone any theories on why legend would then post a thread suggesting that I had lost the plot?
Anyone any idea why legend would copy and paste just selected portions of this valuable and informative piece of academic research and try to off it up as my own thought when i had quite clearly referenced it at the beginning?
Anyone any idea why legend should just pick out of that very long piece one sentence about cyberstalkers possibly also having paedophile tendencies and present that one sentence from the research findings as being me accusing him of being a paedophile?
And he says I have lost the plot!
(during the above how many people thought in response to my questions any of the following:
'not me'
'who cares'
'Good point'
'he's crazy'
'go google'
'Garth Brooks Rules OK'
dot.hawkes
Sat 04/04/09
00:22 go away legend now you are stalking me, you're both just plain creepy
Could it be because knobby and legend kept posting rubbish on any thread i started or got involved in that had nothing to do with the subject under debate?
Anyone wonder why I went onto google and googled 'cyberstalker'?
Anyone wonder why I copied and pasted three very large pieces of research into the subject?
Anyone wonder how Legend and a few of his lamebrain followers could decide that i had actually commissioned, researched, analysed, verified typed and published the thesis myself in the space of 10 seconds?
Anyone any theories on why legend would then post a thread suggesting that I had lost the plot?
Anyone any idea why legend would copy and paste just selected portions of this valuable and informative piece of academic research and try to off it up as my own thought when i had quite clearly referenced it at the beginning?
Anyone any idea why legend should just pick out of that very long piece one sentence about cyberstalkers possibly also having paedophile tendencies and present that one sentence from the research findings as being me accusing him of being a paedophile?
And he says I have lost the plot!
(during the above how many people thought in response to my questions any of the following:
'not me'
'who cares'
'Good point'
'he's crazy'
'go google'
'Garth Brooks Rules OK'
morning puddi, yes you will be correct about that, context is not one of his strong points, it doesn't always serve his purpose to quote accurately, he prefers to be more selective and as he reads what he wants to read into anything, it fdoes stand to reason he is going to quote to suit his own ends, basically he is wasted on here, he should work in newspapers as he can turn the truth into a lie like the best of em on fleet street
puddicr@p stop lying you thought that a user accusing another user of being a paedophile was funny, you are a sad sick person to think that . Hang your head in shame.
there are kids all across the country being sexually abused and YOU think it is a laughing matter.
dot you are wrong too you know what your copied post from the urban dictionary insinuates, you should retract that now if you have an ounce of decency. ok you and legend won't be any closer but there should be a line that should not be crossed. thinly veiled accusations of peadophillia should be on the other side of the line.
there are kids all across the country being sexually abused and YOU think it is a laughing matter.
dot you are wrong too you know what your copied post from the urban dictionary insinuates, you should retract that now if you have an ounce of decency. ok you and legend won't be any closer but there should be a line that should not be crossed. thinly veiled accusations of peadophillia should be on the other side of the line.
noknow she will never retract it shes a paedophilic abuse poster now
add that to threatening you and calling you a racist and a stalker .abusing knobbys wife and saying she was shagging the barman!!!
dot may have made good contributions in the past.
is it any wonder folk now see her as slightly deranged evil and bitter
posting such abuse?
puddicat iread that last nite from you
you really need to lay off the booze you are becoming worse.
add that to threatening you and calling you a racist and a stalker .abusing knobbys wife and saying she was shagging the barman!!!
dot may have made good contributions in the past.
is it any wonder folk now see her as slightly deranged evil and bitter
posting such abuse?
puddicat iread that last nite from you
you really need to lay off the booze you are becoming worse.
I ALSO GOOGLED CYBERSTALKER
NO SIGN OF URBAN DICTIONARY ON THE FIRST PAGE ???
STRANGE EH?
DID DOT NEED TO SEARCH FOR ADEFINITION THAT HAD THE WORD PAEDOPHILE IN IT?
WHAT A SAD WOMAN
TOP RESULT
WIKIDPEDIA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking
Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk someone.
It has been defined as the use of information and communications technology, particularly the Internet, by an individual or group of individuals, to harass another individual, group of individuals, or organization. The behavior includes false accusations, monitoring, the transmission of threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sexual purposes, and gathering information for harassment purposes. The harassment must be such that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1]
READ IT ITS VERY INTERESTING
False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[4]
WELL DOT READING THAT ID SAY ACCORDING TO GOOGLE
YOU ARE CYBERSTALKING ME
HOWZATTTTTTTT?��
NO SIGN OF URBAN DICTIONARY ON THE FIRST PAGE ???
STRANGE EH?
DID DOT NEED TO SEARCH FOR ADEFINITION THAT HAD THE WORD PAEDOPHILE IN IT?
WHAT A SAD WOMAN
TOP RESULT
WIKIDPEDIA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking
Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk someone.
It has been defined as the use of information and communications technology, particularly the Internet, by an individual or group of individuals, to harass another individual, group of individuals, or organization. The behavior includes false accusations, monitoring, the transmission of threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sexual purposes, and gathering information for harassment purposes. The harassment must be such that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1]
READ IT ITS VERY INTERESTING
False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[4]
WELL DOT READING THAT ID SAY ACCORDING TO GOOGLE
YOU ARE CYBERSTALKING ME
HOWZATTTTTTTT?��
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.