News4 mins ago
Ann Widdecombe will win Strictly
24 Answers
According to the diary of today's Mail On Sunday, Ann Widdecombe (and Anton du Beke) has been getting many more votes than any other contestants on Strictly. There is, stupidly, no dance-off this year and as we know the public loves to vote for underdogs and jokers, and the BBC can't afford any more vote-rigging scandals, so Widdecombe has to be firm favourite despite the talents of Scott-t-t-t-t, Kara and Pamela. I suggest the BBC annoiunces ASAP that they'll reintroduce the dance-off for the last few rounds, otherwise this series will end in farce. What do you think?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by chirpychirpy. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.think she's a terric sport to have a go and think she looked much better last night than in previous rounds - maybe even a little slimmer. Wish she would stop pre-empting the judge's remarks though. As for winning, maybe the BBC need to difine whether this is a dance competition or an entertainment show. Either way not really any skin off my nose so good luck to them all (cept maybe flexible Felicity who for some reason irritates me to pieces! - sorry)
I think the contestants, the judges, the public and, more importantly, Ann herself realise that it would be a travesty if she were to win. She's entertaining but she's not a particularly good dancer and this show is (or should be) about picking the best dancers.
She's not stupid, and she's no stranger to being opposed and even laughed at in the past, so I really don't think this will worry her too much, Matt. Like many of them, she's on that show for exposure. She sees a career as a TV personality rather than as politician and this his how she's going to show she can do it.
I think she will do a John Sargent. She'll go so far and then, if the public still votes for her, will bow out gracefully.
And if she's done nothing else, she's shown that the older, more portly and less athletic among us can still enjoy and benefit from dancing.
She's not stupid, and she's no stranger to being opposed and even laughed at in the past, so I really don't think this will worry her too much, Matt. Like many of them, she's on that show for exposure. She sees a career as a TV personality rather than as politician and this his how she's going to show she can do it.
I think she will do a John Sargent. She'll go so far and then, if the public still votes for her, will bow out gracefully.
And if she's done nothing else, she's shown that the older, more portly and less athletic among us can still enjoy and benefit from dancing.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.