Donate SIGN UP

Sack Jason Gardner

Avatar Image
Headbanger | 07:18 Mon 07th Feb 2011 | ChatterBank
15 Answers
Trying to analyse the shock result in Dancing on Ice last night.I'm convinced the public had no intention of getting rid of Jennifer,and there was a massive anti-JG vote as a result of his outrageous insults to Karen and the skaters.Similar voting kept John Sargent and Jedward in competitions,and put Nick Clegg into power..I believe the only way ITV can restore credibility to this programme would be to dump Jason Gardner,in the same way that Sky dumped their presenters when they overstepped the mark.This would restore Karen to her rightful place on the panel and give the skaters an incentive to do well.
However it seems that many successful TV programmes have the obligatory rude "celebrity" (Anne Robinson,Craig RH,Simon Cowell etc) so I doubt whether ITV will have the guts to do this,unless viewers desert the programme in millions.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 15 of 15rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Headbanger. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Maybe they should just domaway with the whole show. It's tediously long and due to the events you are referring to, has no credibility as a genuine competition.
Do people actually watch that trash?
Question Author
But a lot of the celebs who go on say its been the best experience of their lives.Unfortunately most of these type of programmes suffer from being too long,with endless action replays (Come Dine With Me e.g) It just needs a good shake-up
Question Author
Ahttp://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/tv/dancing-on
-ice/2011/01/10/dancing-on-ice-has-best-openi
ng-night-viewing-figures-for-5-years-115875-2
2839035/
apparently yes
How odd!
Question Author
Ever since the roman gladiators,human beings have always derived pleasure in watching other human beings under pressure.The TV companies are just pandering to this (and making a wad of cash in the process)
Hang on...

You're comparing the voting of a TV programme with the voting of an MP?

Eh?
Question Author
Boo,I was just making the point that when people vote tactically against the one they dont want, rather than for the one they do,in any situation, it can produce unexpected results.
how can it be tactics, when the public vote for their favourite (i.e. not the best, just their favourite) that they want to save. judges views, as seen from last night, are immeterial and largley irrelevant.
and why get rid of jason ? we'd just end up with cliche fawning and pandering like on x factor. 'you should be in the final'. 'you have arrived' 'you are a true popstar' 'you've got what it takes' etc etc - its crap and dull and doesn't aid improvement.

and if emma bunton says 'absolutely' one more time my foot will go through the telly.
the whole show gets on my wick, from botox jane (torvil) to giggily airhead holly
Awww, I like Holly.
-- answer removed --
as long as they don't vote off that Laura chick I'll pretend to watch the rest every week!
I haven't a clue who on earth would vote for Denise and Kerry, both repulsive women in every sense.
'Trying to analyse the shock result in Dancing on Ice last night.'

That was your first mistake

1 to 15 of 15rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Sack Jason Gardner

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.