Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Open sockets (switched on) waste electricity - Alistair Campbell
On "The Wright Stuff" (Channel 5) this morning (26 June 2012), Alistair Campbell said that open sockets (i.e. with no plug in them) use electricity if they are switched on. Could this be true? I don't see how, but Campbell is not a complete idiot, and I presume he must have got this information from somewhere. Is it an urban myth? He did not mention that it might only apply to sockets that have a light to indicate that they are on.
If it is true, would it still be using electricity if there was an appliance plugged in (not switched on, of course).
If it is true, I presume it must be be a current of micromicroamps.
They were talking about an item in the Daily Telegraph that said that the average family wastes £86 per year by leaving items on stand-by, or leaving battery chargers on when the batteries are fully charged, that sort of thing.
If it is true, would it still be using electricity if there was an appliance plugged in (not switched on, of course).
If it is true, I presume it must be be a current of micromicroamps.
They were talking about an item in the Daily Telegraph that said that the average family wastes £86 per year by leaving items on stand-by, or leaving battery chargers on when the batteries are fully charged, that sort of thing.
Answers
Campbell is more dangerous than a complete idiot.
13:37 Tue 26th Jun 2012
Somebody should tell Campbell that you can get socket covers (see link below) which prevent any electricity leakage.
Amazon.co.uk User Recommendation
Amazon.co.uk User Recommendation
Seems odd - he might have been thinking about indicator ones.
I'm suspicious about some of these statistics about wasted electricity with devices powered up because the truth of the matter is that device vary enormously.
Older equipment did use quite a lot of power on standby but more modern TVs etc use less than 1 watt
Similar with chargers - the more sophisticated ones switch off when there is no charging, but the less smart ones don't and you cann actually feel they're still warm when they're not charging.
So the notion of "Average" here is very variable.
Also while people are getting very excited about this they should perhaps first think about the efficiency of their existing appliances.
The efficiency of Power gobblers like tumble driers probably account for way more electricity waste than standby devices and if you've old inefficient models your first port of call should probably be upgrading these
I'm suspicious about some of these statistics about wasted electricity with devices powered up because the truth of the matter is that device vary enormously.
Older equipment did use quite a lot of power on standby but more modern TVs etc use less than 1 watt
Similar with chargers - the more sophisticated ones switch off when there is no charging, but the less smart ones don't and you cann actually feel they're still warm when they're not charging.
So the notion of "Average" here is very variable.
Also while people are getting very excited about this they should perhaps first think about the efficiency of their existing appliances.
The efficiency of Power gobblers like tumble driers probably account for way more electricity waste than standby devices and if you've old inefficient models your first port of call should probably be upgrading these
If you have one or more of those "black boxes" which rectify and transform the AC voltage to DC, and you leave them plugged in with the socket switch on, then they will use a small amount of electricity. eg the box that lies between your laptop and the socket, etc. If you want to save electricity then when your laptop is charged up either unplug the charger or flick the switch on the socket to off.
It surpises me that people worry about a few watt hours per year being wasted on electroics on standby yet they cheerfully waste huge amounts of money on everything from cosmetics and mobile phones to gas guzzling 4x4s. You may ask how does spending money on things like cosmetics and other apparently low energy items, waste energy? The answer is that the profits made by the manufacturers are spent and money spent has an energy equivalent which in turn has a CO2 equivalent.
I can't see how. Switching the socket off only disconnects the positive outlet from the wire, so there is still an active flow of protons in the wire to the fusebox. The only difference is the brass connection of the switch which is live/not live. The combined "waste" from all the sockets in the UK would be so small that I don't think you could run one 60w light bulb on it.
Total ball*cks the guy IS a total idiot.
A neon 'on' indicator' would use a few micro-amps if the plug was left 'live' but the current would be so small it could hardly be measured.Cost perhaps round 0.2pence a year.
A plug that is just 'open' uses no current at all not even a single micro-amp .
I can only assume he is getting confused with TVs etc that are left plugged in on' stand by' some of these do use a measurable amount of current and a few £s a year could be saved by disconnecting them totally when not in use.
The guy needs to remember the old saying EBBOM ( Engage Brain Before Opening Mouth) he has made himself look a right prat.
A neon 'on' indicator' would use a few micro-amps if the plug was left 'live' but the current would be so small it could hardly be measured.Cost perhaps round 0.2pence a year.
A plug that is just 'open' uses no current at all not even a single micro-amp .
I can only assume he is getting confused with TVs etc that are left plugged in on' stand by' some of these do use a measurable amount of current and a few £s a year could be saved by disconnecting them totally when not in use.
The guy needs to remember the old saying EBBOM ( Engage Brain Before Opening Mouth) he has made himself look a right prat.
RATTER15, you sound like a live wire, so I don't anticipate any resistance to my suggestion as to watt to do with your waste electricity. The current thinking is to find an open circuit (not a closed one, not a short one) and pour the stuff in via the first available aperture. Electricity thrives in a good ohm, so I hope that my idea has the potential to spark off a whole grid-full of enlightening ideas. Best of luck.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.