Quizzes & Puzzles15 mins ago
Could This Bedroom Tax.
73 Answers
Could this unfair Tax be taken to Strazburg?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by TWR. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Whilst on the face of it, the idea seems reasonable - it could well have a backlash and the HB amounts paid out increase.
http:// www.24d ash.com /news/h ousing/ 2013-02 -25-Bed room-ta x-with- cost-ta xpayers -more
http://
they want you to move out if you have an extra room, or pay more effectively, but they haven't said as yet where you are supposed to go, how you are supposed to make any savings even in a smaller property, or indeed as our local authority is suggesting moving some families out of the borough and capital altogether, they have suggested Birmingham and Leicester, lovely
no that won't do, if you are in social housing or private rented accommodation and get housing benefit and you have, according to the council, government more bedrooms than you need, you will do one of two things, move to somewhere smaller or get less in housing benefit, in effect pay more towards your home. Does that make sense?
It is hard in instances like this to take human emotions out of the equation but for the purpose of debate we must. No one is saying that a couple should have all rent paid on a 3 bed property when families need them,
But take for an example a young family with 2 small children who were allocated a 3 bed property, baby sleeps in the third bedroom just now - they are deemed to have a spare room, if on the husbands low wage he cannot not afford to cover the shortfall on his rental , they may need to go into private accommodation.
Result - a higher rent meaning higher HB payout.
But take for an example a young family with 2 small children who were allocated a 3 bed property, baby sleeps in the third bedroom just now - they are deemed to have a spare room, if on the husbands low wage he cannot not afford to cover the shortfall on his rental , they may need to go into private accommodation.
Result - a higher rent meaning higher HB payout.
It makes perfect sense. The councils desperately need family homes for families in urgent need; it makes sense to encourage a single person or couple to move in to smaller accommodation, especially when the tax payer is paying for it.
After all, many home owners have no choice in downsizing when their circumstances change. Tenants who pay their own rents, too, move if they can't afford the rent on the current homes.
After all, many home owners have no choice in downsizing when their circumstances change. Tenants who pay their own rents, too, move if they can't afford the rent on the current homes.
It is only social housing formerly known as council houses that is involved. For instance, if you are a single person living in a 3 bedroom house you will either have to pay extra rent or let out the two spare bedrooms to lodgers. It is designed, in my opinion to force out single people living in bigger houses than they really need into single bedroom flats or if there is such a thing available, one bedroom houses. Not very nice if you have lived in that house all your life and brought up a family of children, all of whom have moved out. I suppose there is reason for it if you consider the amount of people now waiting for somewhere a bit decent to live, but there you are - if you live in a tied house you must be prepared to have to leave it at some time, and as long as they provide you with an alternative place to live, there does not seem to be much you can do about it.