Quizzes & Puzzles6 mins ago
Not A A Happy Bunny!
21 Answers
Had a letter today from Lloyds motor insurance. Thanking me for updating them on a recent claim. They are increasing my policy by another £105.
I phoned and told them I haven't made a claim. They say it was September last year.it turns out OH was driving his car and he slightly touched a car in Lidls car park. There was not much damage at all. He polished ours out.
Apparently the driver claimed £2100 off his insurance.
It seems so unfair it was his car he was driving yet I get penalised on my car because he was a named driver on my policy.
How can someone claim so much for a tiny scrape. If I want to cancel the policy it will cost me £55.
I phoned and told them I haven't made a claim. They say it was September last year.it turns out OH was driving his car and he slightly touched a car in Lidls car park. There was not much damage at all. He polished ours out.
Apparently the driver claimed £2100 off his insurance.
It seems so unfair it was his car he was driving yet I get penalised on my car because he was a named driver on my policy.
How can someone claim so much for a tiny scrape. If I want to cancel the policy it will cost me £55.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Caran. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.That was what I thought so I phoned them. They were adamant that I had to pay the extra cost as his insurance has gone up and as he is a named driver my cost for him will go up too.
It doesn't seem right at all.
And how someone can claim £2100 for a tiny Mark when OH Polished ours out, well I think someone was taken for a ride there.
It doesn't seem right at all.
And how someone can claim £2100 for a tiny Mark when OH Polished ours out, well I think someone was taken for a ride there.
If he polished out the damage on his car and didn't tell you at the time, how can you be confident about his assessment of the other party's damage being "not much .. at all" ?
And garages are notorious for milking such cases for all they're worth, so the other driver is really only a helpless pawn in their skulduggery.
And garages are notorious for milking such cases for all they're worth, so the other driver is really only a helpless pawn in their skulduggery.
The same thing happened to me. My husband’s car was bumped by a neighbour while it was parked outside our house. He wasn’t even in it! The damage was paid for by the other driver’s insurance. He is a named driver on my policy and my insurance went up as a result. As my husband wasn’t in the car, I argued that this was unfair but to no avail.
I agree with danny, I thought the only time putting a named driver on was to reduce costs like a parent for example on a young person's to reduce the named driver's cost (or similar). I don't see the point of mature adults naming each other, you should both be insured to drive any car third party anyway.
took a taxi and the fella said
you were in the car that backed into mine a few years ago, what happened?
and I said she took £6 000 off the insurance for whiplash
and HE said - god she was only rubbing her wrist !
and I said I only found out when I read all his insurance policy and it said previous claims £6000. we said she was blagging and the company just paid.
[yes I realise that some Abers will find this sorry tale of a blagger ripping off an insurance company Very Difficult to follow]
you were in the car that backed into mine a few years ago, what happened?
and I said she took £6 000 off the insurance for whiplash
and HE said - god she was only rubbing her wrist !
and I said I only found out when I read all his insurance policy and it said previous claims £6000. we said she was blagging and the company just paid.
[yes I realise that some Abers will find this sorry tale of a blagger ripping off an insurance company Very Difficult to follow]