E=MC Cubed

[Pies]

Discuss

[fo3nix]

totally pointless.

Einstein did not put the (squared) term there for no reason, it is there for very good reason.

[ronniemonda8]

E = MC Hammer

[bernardo]

No it isn't

[Gnisy]

Can you repeat the question?

[bobjim1705]

E = McNuggets.

[mibn2cweus]

E=MC Cubed as it relates to E=mc^2 is meaningless in that it (E=mc^2) applies only to mass at rest relative to the observes rest frame. However if we substitute for m a particle moving at a certain velocity very close to but less than the speed of light the equality may hold for that particular velocity but I venture to guess that would for physics be nothing short of mathematical and relativistic blasphemy and as far as I know nothing larger than subatomic particles have ever been observed at such velocities and this particular velocity has no special significance. Nevertheless, I am a bit curious as to whether any physicist�s out there would care to explain if/then why this is total non-sense. If not would this apply only for the observer or would the particle actually possess this extra energy?

[Space]

it's "squared", not "cubed".
You need to learn to read it before discussing it.

[ronniemonda8]

Space, didn't u used to be on here as 'Time'?

[einsteinsdog]

The square law is basic to science . There are not many cube laws , especially with velocity in (even none) so the question is a red herring but a clever one . Even an ordinary scientist can smell a rat here

[c00ky83]

The units don't add up.

[fo3nix]

mibn2cweus: a particle (with intrinsic mass) can have as much energy as it likes, and thus can becomes as heavy as it likes.

[mibn2cweus]

fo3nix, Thanks, for some of us exploring �crazy� ideas can at least be enlightening.