News17 mins ago
Is This Quantum Physics Law Now Defunct ?
hi peeps, let me start by saying i am no scientist but i do have an inquizative mind, right here goes :) , since scientists have now found particals that can travel faster than the speed of light (neutrino's), what happens to that particals properties, and as as far as i am aware "the speed of light is 300,000 kilometers per second (186,000 miles per second) and when an object moves at this speed, its mass will become infinite. Therefore, infinite energy will be required to move the object", so does this mean that this theory is now defunct, please answer in laymans terms as i said earlier i am no scientist, thanking peeps in advance for any replies
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by fatgaz. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ."ok i know im a pain but if photons have no mass then how do laser beams work ? " - Laser is Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. Essentially using energy, electricity for example to stimulate a "lasing material" into emitting light. The photons are still massless though 0 mass does not equal 0 energy.
To add to Jim's post, in the same way that Photons are the electromagnetic boson, Higgs is the mass boson, though just to confuse things, the Higgs does have mass!
To add to Jim's post, in the same way that Photons are the electromagnetic boson, Higgs is the mass boson, though just to confuse things, the Higgs does have mass!
Indeed! Although I was wanting to stay away from the Higgs boson stuff because of how technical it is.
It's also worth noting that the Higgs boson isn't even strictly necessary to explain mass anyway. It actually solves a different, albeit highly related, problem. But it would be possible to design a Universe in which there were no Higgs boson, but mass was still a thing.
It's also worth noting that the Higgs boson isn't even strictly necessary to explain mass anyway. It actually solves a different, albeit highly related, problem. But it would be possible to design a Universe in which there were no Higgs boson, but mass was still a thing.
whilst looking at SK's video I noticed another that I thought was a very neat explanation of why >c travel is impossible, so I Thought I'd start another science post, as science is pretty quiet these days, anyway here's another one to have a go at:
https:/ /www.th eanswer bank.co .uk/Sci ence/Qu estion1 724872. html
https:/
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.