Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Try this one....
(I was told this ages ago, and the answer - but I can't remember what it was, so lets see if you will get it)
You have a very long cord. You twist it around at a speed close to, but not reaching the speed of light. The end of the cord will be going faster that the speed at the centre (think of a whip - the end moves faster than the speed of sound). But nothing can go faster than the speed of light! How is it possible that the end of the cord is going faster than the centre (- "close to the speed of light") ?
I'm sorry if this question is a bit confusing, i'll try to clear up any queries, but I just remember being asked this question, so I might have wrote something wrong.
You have a very long cord. You twist it around at a speed close to, but not reaching the speed of light. The end of the cord will be going faster that the speed at the centre (think of a whip - the end moves faster than the speed of sound). But nothing can go faster than the speed of light! How is it possible that the end of the cord is going faster than the centre (- "close to the speed of light") ?
I'm sorry if this question is a bit confusing, i'll try to clear up any queries, but I just remember being asked this question, so I might have wrote something wrong.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by chainfire. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.this was on QI and they said that when a whip is cracked the leather curls up more and more the at the end it creates a mini sonic boom and thats it going to the speed of sound (the question he asked was wat was the first thing to reach the speed of light (they said stuff like a plane that was alan davis!))
-- answer removed --
just wondering, how can light reach that speed, but nothing else can? Also, I think I read somewhere that just after the big bang, matter moved faster than the speed of light: basic link (quickly googled): http://www.astronomycafe.net/qadir/q2554.html
yea, the whip crack is a tiny sonic boom. but this speed is nowhere near the speed of light, so doesn't need any special relativity.
photons, the particles that make up the electromagnetic spectrum are, as you say, massless. only a massless particle can travel at the speed of light, and it'll always do so. any particles with mass (even very small mass) can get closer and closer to the speed of light, but will never quite reach it.
there are theoretical particles called tachyons that travel at speeds greater than the speed of light, but again can never quite reach the speed of light. but to them this means they can't quites slow down enough. however, these are very theoretical. it's just something allowed by some equations, but that's no real indication that they might exist.
photons, the particles that make up the electromagnetic spectrum are, as you say, massless. only a massless particle can travel at the speed of light, and it'll always do so. any particles with mass (even very small mass) can get closer and closer to the speed of light, but will never quite reach it.
there are theoretical particles called tachyons that travel at speeds greater than the speed of light, but again can never quite reach the speed of light. but to them this means they can't quites slow down enough. however, these are very theoretical. it's just something allowed by some equations, but that's no real indication that they might exist.
chainfire: yea, you're right. there's no difference between radio waves, x-rays, light, etc. apart from the frequency of the wave.
zevon: the graviton does not theoretically travel instantaneously. this was Newton's idea, but Einstein modified it to travel at the speed of light.
neutrinos are perhaps massless, perhaps not. there's not definite score with them yet. recent experiements like the super-K have shown them to be not massless.
zevon: the graviton does not theoretically travel instantaneously. this was Newton's idea, but Einstein modified it to travel at the speed of light.
neutrinos are perhaps massless, perhaps not. there's not definite score with them yet. recent experiements like the super-K have shown them to be not massless.