News3 mins ago
Matter or not?
Scientists tell us there are thousands of tonnes of space debris falling on earth every year.Does that mean Earth is getting heavier?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by marlonski. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Unless you are a creationist delboy3, you can't produce matter out of nothing, just like you can't create energy out of nothing. To make it more simple read up on 3 Laws of Thermodynamics. I.E.:
Energy can neither be created nor destroyed, although it can be converted from one form to another.
Whenever a quantity of one form of energy disappears, an equivalent amount of energy of another form appears.
The total energy of an isolated system remains constant, whatever changes take place within the system.
Energy can neither be created nor destroyed, although it can be converted from one form to another.
Whenever a quantity of one form of energy disappears, an equivalent amount of energy of another form appears.
The total energy of an isolated system remains constant, whatever changes take place within the system.
To put this in some perspective, assuming a rate of accretion of 100 metric tons annually:
The total surface area of the Earth is about 510 000 000 square kilometers (~ 200 000 000 square miles). For an accretion rate of 100 ton/year this results in about one gram per square kilometer every five years.
In relation to the total mass of the Earth (~ 6 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 kilograms), an accretion rate of 100 ton/year will contribute an addition of one part in one million, million, million of the Earth�s mass every 60 years.
In relation to the Earth at lot of matter does not necessarily matter a lot. On the other hand if it hit all at once as one big asteroid . . .
The total surface area of the Earth is about 510 000 000 square kilometers (~ 200 000 000 square miles). For an accretion rate of 100 ton/year this results in about one gram per square kilometer every five years.
In relation to the total mass of the Earth (~ 6 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 kilograms), an accretion rate of 100 ton/year will contribute an addition of one part in one million, million, million of the Earth�s mass every 60 years.
In relation to the Earth at lot of matter does not necessarily matter a lot. On the other hand if it hit all at once as one big asteroid . . .
Actually I went home, Loosehead. And your argument still doesn't stand but then again most of them don't. What I'm saying is that as we get older, we gather more mass (i.e. get heavier)(especially in the USA) so surely as the human population steadily increases, this would also increase the earth's mass - albeit to a minuscule degree. Why you would state that all of our body mass is "already here" before we are born and before we grow up just doesn't make sense.
So the extra weight as we grow comes from outer space does it delboy? I think my arguments stand up a bit better than you think.
Just engage you brain for a minute, we are made of atoms of the elements. Any part of you body was already on earth It adds no mass to the planets.
Can someone else try a different angle I think I've taken on a level of density beyond my ability to explain here!
Just engage you brain for a minute, we are made of atoms of the elements. Any part of you body was already on earth It adds no mass to the planets.
Can someone else try a different angle I think I've taken on a level of density beyond my ability to explain here!
So the extra weight as we grow comes from outer space does it delboy? I think my arguments stand up a bit better than you think.
Just engage your brain for a minute, we are made of atoms of the elements. Any part of your body was already on earth It adds no mass to the planet.
Can someone else try a different angle I think I've taken on a level of density beyond my ability to explain here!
Just engage your brain for a minute, we are made of atoms of the elements. Any part of your body was already on earth It adds no mass to the planet.
Can someone else try a different angle I think I've taken on a level of density beyond my ability to explain here!
OK, I concede on this one. I had only made a suggestion without researching it and got swiped with a sarky fish. I just couldn't see how an increasing biological mass had no effect on the mass of its host.
The donuts are on me...
http://animatedtv.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite .htm?zi=1/XJ&sdn=animatedtv&zu=http%3A%2F%2Fww w.geocities.com%2FTelevisionCity%2F2034%2Fimag es.html
The donuts are on me...
http://animatedtv.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite .htm?zi=1/XJ&sdn=animatedtv&zu=http%3A%2F%2Fww w.geocities.com%2FTelevisionCity%2F2034%2Fimag es.html