Quizzes & Puzzles15 mins ago
how hot will the earth get by the year 2100
15 Answers
by the year 2100, how much do scientists believe the earth will warm by ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by budweiserlea. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Lots of different figures about between 2 and 5 degrees seems likely.
London (Greenwich) has an average July temperature of 17 degrees if it has an average of 22 degrees that would be close the average temperature to what Marseille currently gets.
Marseille would be close to Cairo, Florida will be close to Saudi Arabia.
Of course that's over simplistic but you get the general idea
London (Greenwich) has an average July temperature of 17 degrees if it has an average of 22 degrees that would be close the average temperature to what Marseille currently gets.
Marseille would be close to Cairo, Florida will be close to Saudi Arabia.
Of course that's over simplistic but you get the general idea
I saw Time Team CH4 the other night, they were digging in an old gravel pit in Oxfordshire, one of the experts found fossiliszed beetle remains and explained that the species are around today and are found in Spain. He said they were here in England thousands of years ago as the climate then was a lot warmer. Well considering there were no pollutants in the air then, can`t we say that Global Warming is nothing new! Also this weather cycle is not coming fast enough for me, I had to spend a small fortune this year to go to Spain for some decent weather.
No we can't Buster
There are cycles relating to the Earth's orbit and the sun's output.
The current concern is based on the claim that the most recent cycle of warming is not explained by these and is due to our activity.
If that's the case and we do nothing it will not be a cycle like before but an ever increasing rise.
Regardless of whether or not it's man made it's ceratinly real and there is likely to be a lot more serious consequences than less people taking foreign holidays
There are cycles relating to the Earth's orbit and the sun's output.
The current concern is based on the claim that the most recent cycle of warming is not explained by these and is due to our activity.
If that's the case and we do nothing it will not be a cycle like before but an ever increasing rise.
Regardless of whether or not it's man made it's ceratinly real and there is likely to be a lot more serious consequences than less people taking foreign holidays
but there is no definitve proof that this is happening - scientists disagree.
only around 2% of atmospheric CO2 is from humans - the remainder from natural causes.
And apparently now, it has been suggested that reduction in sunspot activity will counteract any warming caused by 'the greenhouse effect'
only around 2% of atmospheric CO2 is from humans - the remainder from natural causes.
And apparently now, it has been suggested that reduction in sunspot activity will counteract any warming caused by 'the greenhouse effect'
Well that's a bit tough to believe, sunspots follow an 11 year major cycle and have been pretty heavily studied ever since Galileo's time. I'd be surprised if there was something that major that was not already included in the existing climate models.
What we do know for sure is that glaciers are at their smallest for many hundreds of years possibly thousands of years
The 2% human contribution issue is misleading because although it's small it's not in balance.
Every year we put in 6 billion tons but only 3 billion are removed.
In TOTAL green house gasses are up 25% in the last 150 years.
And these are figures from the American Department of Energy not the Guardian
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ggccebro/chap ter1.html
So pretty much everybody's agreed the planets going to get warmer the only question is whether or not we're going to seriously try to do something about it or whether we're going to put our trust in sunspots.
What we do know for sure is that glaciers are at their smallest for many hundreds of years possibly thousands of years
The 2% human contribution issue is misleading because although it's small it's not in balance.
Every year we put in 6 billion tons but only 3 billion are removed.
In TOTAL green house gasses are up 25% in the last 150 years.
And these are figures from the American Department of Energy not the Guardian
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ggccebro/chap ter1.html
So pretty much everybody's agreed the planets going to get warmer the only question is whether or not we're going to seriously try to do something about it or whether we're going to put our trust in sunspots.
What about Al Gore's documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" were he asserts that we will reach a "point of no return" in the next 10 years ? I think the truth of the matter is we are doing a crazy experiment on a planetary sized system that we neither completely understand nor are capable of mitigating in any reasonable amount of time (i.e. before the warming effects have caused much grief for our planet's inhabitants for many decades) . Another distinct possibility is melting of arctic ice may so dilute the North Atlantic that the sea currents that carry heat from the equator to the northern latitudes may stall out causing a mini ice age of several decades before a bout of global heat and drought ensues. Bottom line- we need to stop with the archaic fossil fuel burning in our circa 1900 machines ( petrol cars and coal power plants) and we need to do it real soon. This is a passion of mine and I welcome comments.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.