As a point for discussion, one researcher says "...Twelve years after Darwin wrote his book attributing the origin of species to natural selection, he wrote another book 898 pages long, attributing the origin of human races to our sexual preferences, which I described in the last chapter, and entirely rejecting a role of natural selection. Despite that verbal overkill, many readers were unconvinced. To this day, Darwin's theory of sexual selection (as he called it) remains controversial. Instead, modern biologists generally invoke natural selection to explain the visible differences among human races especially the differences in skin color, whose relation to sun exposure seems obvious. However, biologists can't even agree on why natural selection led to dark skin in the tropics."
This research bioligist (Jared Diamond) makes a good case for your observed results having more to do with sexual selection rather than little, if any, natural selection dependant on location... Full article here:
http://www.mc.maricopa.edu/dept/d10/asb/anthro 2003/origins/sexselection.html ...