Donate SIGN UP

Evolution of human pelvic size, head size and walking

Avatar Image
Will__ | 21:26 Tue 19th Jun 2007 | How it Works
2 Answers
A dinner party discussion turned interesting:

I put forward a theory I'd heard that says that during human evolution, pelvic size had to decrease to allow for normal bipedal walking. The theory states that both walking and an increasing brain size meant that human babies used to spend more time in the womb but through evolution spent less and less time there so that a) their brains (and thus heads) could be larger and b) humans could walk better with a narrowed pelvic aperture.

My friend refuted this; I don't know where I heard the theory but would love to know if anyone else had heard this or knows of its source. And does anyone know how much longer they used to spend in there?

Thanks.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 2 of 2rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Will__. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Point your friend to this article.
Question Author
heathfield, thanks for your answer.
I'm looking, however, for a more scholarly-sourced article or medically sourced page.

The article you pointed me to, while well written and argued, isn't written by an anthroplogist.....

Also, I'm looking for the amount of time anthropologists think human babies used to spend in the womb....

I'm going to cross-post to the science section - if this is a no-no, can an admin please tell me?

Thanks.

1 to 2 of 2rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Evolution of human pelvic size, head size and walking

Answer Question >>