Technology1 min ago
insurance company denying the laws of physics
8 Answers
i was the last car involved in a multiple pile up
my contention is that i had allowed the correct stopping distance and had come to rest, when,
the car in front of me under newtons (cradle) effect came backwards and hit me
my insurers wont wear this
my contention is that i had allowed the correct stopping distance and had come to rest, when,
the car in front of me under newtons (cradle) effect came backwards and hit me
my insurers wont wear this
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by helpmetoo. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Hmm, I wouldn't consider this a valid argument if I was dealing with this claim.
Whilst I appreciate that braking forces mean that the front of the vehicle braking goes down and the back goes up, you must have been damn close when the impact occurred.
A safe braking distance should indicate that you are not left with milimetres to spare. The simple fact of the matter is that you were following too close for the conditions if you stopped within a gnat's pube of the other vehicle.
Whilst I appreciate that braking forces mean that the front of the vehicle braking goes down and the back goes up, you must have been damn close when the impact occurred.
A safe braking distance should indicate that you are not left with milimetres to spare. The simple fact of the matter is that you were following too close for the conditions if you stopped within a gnat's pube of the other vehicle.
Think about a newtons cradle.
Ball A hits ball B, which hits ball C etc until ball F is hit. The only thing that makes this return back to hit E etc (i.e. resulting in ball A flying backwards) is the fact that ball F is on a bit of string.
What was making the car in front return back to close the gap between it and you?
You were too close.
Ball A hits ball B, which hits ball C etc until ball F is hit. The only thing that makes this return back to hit E etc (i.e. resulting in ball A flying backwards) is the fact that ball F is on a bit of string.
What was making the car in front return back to close the gap between it and you?
You were too close.
Newtons Cradle just won't wash.
Cars are designed to adsorb energy of a collision, not rebound it. There's no way a vehicle involved in a frontal collision whilst all the vehicles are going in the same direction goes backwards post-collision due to rebounded energy.
You perhaps allowed enough thinking distance but not enough braking distance, given that the vehicle ahead of you was stopped well inside its normal braking distance (it crunched).
Try pulling the other one.
Cars are designed to adsorb energy of a collision, not rebound it. There's no way a vehicle involved in a frontal collision whilst all the vehicles are going in the same direction goes backwards post-collision due to rebounded energy.
You perhaps allowed enough thinking distance but not enough braking distance, given that the vehicle ahead of you was stopped well inside its normal braking distance (it crunched).
Try pulling the other one.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.