Crosswords37 mins ago
Physics or electronics? Help!
42 Answers
Could anyone please help with some vague time constant calculations? I know that T=CxR.
The questions set, are: 470mf x 100k (squiggle like an "n")
220mf x 1m ( " )
680mf x 2m ( " )
I assume the m's for million? but I don't even understand what's required!!
Thank you to anyone who can help!
The questions set, are: 470mf x 100k (squiggle like an "n")
220mf x 1m ( " )
680mf x 2m ( " )
I assume the m's for million? but I don't even understand what's required!!
Thank you to anyone who can help!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Ice.Maiden. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Are you sure that you've typed the letter 'm' correctly in every case? A small 'm' means 'milli' (which is one thousandth), whereas a capital 'M' means 'mega' (which is one million. k, of course, means Kilo = 1000).
The time constant formula is t = CR, where t is the time in seconds, C is the capacitance in Farads and R is the resistance in Ohms. (The symbol for ohms is the Greek letter omega, which is your 'squiggle').
I'll assume that you've correctly typed the letter 'm' in every case. So for question 1:
t = 470 x 1/1000 x 100 x 1000 = 470 x 100 = 47000 seconds
(That's a ridiculously large time constant but that's definitely what you get from those figures)
For question 2:
t = 220 x 1/1000 x 1 x 1/1000 = 220 microseceonds = 0.22ms
(which is a far more realist answer for a time constant).
For question 3 we then get:
t = 680 x 1/1000 x 2 x 1/1000 = 1360 microseconds = 1.36ms
Chris
The time constant formula is t = CR, where t is the time in seconds, C is the capacitance in Farads and R is the resistance in Ohms. (The symbol for ohms is the Greek letter omega, which is your 'squiggle').
I'll assume that you've correctly typed the letter 'm' in every case. So for question 1:
t = 470 x 1/1000 x 100 x 1000 = 470 x 100 = 47000 seconds
(That's a ridiculously large time constant but that's definitely what you get from those figures)
For question 2:
t = 220 x 1/1000 x 1 x 1/1000 = 220 microseceonds = 0.22ms
(which is a far more realist answer for a time constant).
For question 3 we then get:
t = 680 x 1/1000 x 2 x 1/1000 = 1360 microseconds = 1.36ms
Chris
Thank you very, very much red-forest. Someone else's just sent me a link to a calculator, which was very good, but I wasn't sure where to enter the figures I gave here.
The squiggle, is like an 'n', but curls out, to the right and left of the bottom of each column of the letter - if that's of any help!
Strangely, I sat working these probs out myself, and also came to 1360 for the final question, and then discarded it. I feel embarrassed to say that I got a decent grasde in physics, but just can't remember how to work these things!
The squiggle, is like an 'n', but curls out, to the right and left of the bottom of each column of the letter - if that's of any help!
Strangely, I sat working these probs out myself, and also came to 1360 for the final question, and then discarded it. I feel embarrassed to say that I got a decent grasde in physics, but just can't remember how to work these things!
Gosh! Oh dear!!!
The figures on the paper appear to be as I've typed above, and actually, my first workings-out fell into line with both of your answers.
Can I just ask you to explain the "220 microseconds = 0.22ms" please? Are they the same thing? I wasn't sure whether it was 22 microseconds, or ).22 microseconds - and this is where i was getting confused. the more I tried to work it out, the more I was getting mixed up!
Very kind of you Chris. x
The figures on the paper appear to be as I've typed above, and actually, my first workings-out fell into line with both of your answers.
Can I just ask you to explain the "220 microseconds = 0.22ms" please? Are they the same thing? I wasn't sure whether it was 22 microseconds, or ).22 microseconds - and this is where i was getting confused. the more I tried to work it out, the more I was getting mixed up!
Very kind of you Chris. x
A microsecond is one millionth of a second. It's written as �s (using the Greek letter �, which I hadn't worked out how to type when I posted previously!)
A millisecond (written as ms) is a thousandth of a second, so 1 ms = 1000 �s.
Or putting it the other way round, 1 �s = 1/1000 ms
So 220 �s = 220/1000 ms = 0.22 ms
A millisecond (written as ms) is a thousandth of a second, so 1 ms = 1000 �s.
Or putting it the other way round, 1 �s = 1/1000 ms
So 220 �s = 220/1000 ms = 0.22 ms
The squiggle is omega (Ω) for ohms.
I too would have expected capacitance to be in microfarads (μF) rather than millifarads (a term so rarely used you tend to see that value expressed as 1000 μF) but then I suppose a school exercise does not have to follow "real world" conventions, although in general I hope they do.
I too would have expected capacitance to be in microfarads (μF) rather than millifarads (a term so rarely used you tend to see that value expressed as 1000 μF) but then I suppose a school exercise does not have to follow "real world" conventions, although in general I hope they do.
Oh guys....can we have a vote on which you think it'd be please?
You don't know how much I appreciate your help, but I'm now struggling to set things out simply in my head. Seems I DID get the answers - in a way - but my friend's daughter WAS talking about farads of course, and all of a sudden, it's gone double-dutch to me again!
You don't know how much I appreciate your help, but I'm now struggling to set things out simply in my head. Seems I DID get the answers - in a way - but my friend's daughter WAS talking about farads of course, and all of a sudden, it's gone double-dutch to me again!
Icey:
Put your original question alongside my initial post. You'll see that all I've really done is to retype your original question but rewriting 'm' as '1/1000' and 'k' as 1000.
As long as you've correctly typed the question (i.e. you've not typed 'm' instead of 'M' or '�') you should be able to see how it all comes together and (hopefully!) my answers should be correct.
Like Kempie, I would expect real-life situations to have much smaller capacitances (and much higher resistances) but, as long as you presented the correct information I should have provided you with the correct answers. (At least I hope so. My degree's in Maths but my teaching certificate is in Maths and Physics, and I taught both subjects)
Put your original question alongside my initial post. You'll see that all I've really done is to retype your original question but rewriting 'm' as '1/1000' and 'k' as 1000.
As long as you've correctly typed the question (i.e. you've not typed 'm' instead of 'M' or '�') you should be able to see how it all comes together and (hopefully!) my answers should be correct.
Like Kempie, I would expect real-life situations to have much smaller capacitances (and much higher resistances) but, as long as you presented the correct information I should have provided you with the correct answers. (At least I hope so. My degree's in Maths but my teaching certificate is in Maths and Physics, and I taught both subjects)
Red-Forest:
Normally when I want to type special characters I refer to this list, which I keep a printed copy of next to my desk:
http://www.tedmontgomery.com/tutorial/ALTchrc. html
For example, to type this � I held down the Alt key and typed 20 on the numeric keypad. (You have to have the number lock on but that's the default keyboard setting on most PCs anyway).
However, with some of the more obscure symbols, different fonts seem to require different Alt codes and that list isn't infallible. For example, AB's character set doesn't produce Ω when I use the code on that page. So I 'cheated' and Googled 'omega'. It wasn't hard to find a page that included the symbol, so I simply copied it and pasted it into my post.
Chris
Normally when I want to type special characters I refer to this list, which I keep a printed copy of next to my desk:
http://www.tedmontgomery.com/tutorial/ALTchrc. html
For example, to type this � I held down the Alt key and typed 20 on the numeric keypad. (You have to have the number lock on but that's the default keyboard setting on most PCs anyway).
However, with some of the more obscure symbols, different fonts seem to require different Alt codes and that list isn't infallible. For example, AB's character set doesn't produce Ω when I use the code on that page. So I 'cheated' and Googled 'omega'. It wasn't hard to find a page that included the symbol, so I simply copied it and pasted it into my post.
Chris
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.