Good answer, Incitatus. The law arose in Physics, because to detect the presence of a particle you have to introduce a separate particle and so while their collision may reveal the position of the original particle, it will affect its speed, and so to detect its speed will not be possible because it has been affected by the experiment. Similarly to detect its speed first is possible, but the test affects its position. So you cannot detect both its speed and position in one experiment. This led to two different conclusions about whether the particle can be said to exist. One (Neils Bohr) was that it is meaningless to speak of the particle until it is measured: it doesn't exist. The other is that the particle exists, but its speed and position are undetermined. Bohr's definition prevailed, but the question is still open.
An interesting sidelight is in Social Sciences. Some scientists claim that all research on a subject (either an individual or a culture) is invalid (from a strict scientific point of view) because the researcher always and inevitably affects the subject during the research.