News1 min ago
Vicky's Secret Geisha Knickers
34 Answers
Victoria's Secret has been criticised over their Geisha collection.
http:// www.vog ue.co.u ...gn=O utbrain %VogueN ews
Is it a tribute to a beautiful race and culture? Or is it, as suggested, "racialised fetishising against Asian women"?
Were they wrong to use the expression "sexy little fantasy"? Isn't that what we all need sometimes?
Will the AB resident lingerie consultant (sqad) have the answer?
http://
Is it a tribute to a beautiful race and culture? Or is it, as suggested, "racialised fetishising against Asian women"?
Were they wrong to use the expression "sexy little fantasy"? Isn't that what we all need sometimes?
Will the AB resident lingerie consultant (sqad) have the answer?
Answers
\\\Is it a tribute to a beautiful race and culture? Or is it, as suggested, "racialised fetishising against Asian women"? \\
it is both JJ...ALL men have fetishes although many refuse to accept this as it is described in some individuals as "mucky"..."perverted" and dare i say this on AB....."perverted."
To me, it is beautiful, natural, erotic and just made for the female form.
it is both JJ...ALL men have fetishes although many refuse to accept this as it is described in some individuals as "mucky"..."perverted" and dare i say this on AB....."perverted."
To me, it is beautiful, natural, erotic and just made for the female form.
at the risk of falling foul of Goodwin's law...
Supposing this had been a collection of Tyrolean underwear bedecked with swastikas, with whips instead of chopsticks, so you could act out your fantasies... would that have been acceptable for a big company (as opposed to a basement in Soho) to be selling?
If not, what's the difference exactly? Are we allowed to have one sort of fantasy but not another? Are we allowed to fetishise one culture but not another?
I don't have a logical answer to any of this.
Supposing this had been a collection of Tyrolean underwear bedecked with swastikas, with whips instead of chopsticks, so you could act out your fantasies... would that have been acceptable for a big company (as opposed to a basement in Soho) to be selling?
If not, what's the difference exactly? Are we allowed to have one sort of fantasy but not another? Are we allowed to fetishise one culture but not another?
I don't have a logical answer to any of this.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.