Quizzes & Puzzles6 mins ago
Would You Walk
38 Answers
In the last week or so I've walked out of 4 shops without getting what I've wanted. A lot of the shops are insisting on card payment, that's fine with me contactless is a great way to pay, so I no longer carry cash. However many are dictating a minimum spend of £5, each time I've gone in my spend has been around £3/£4, so have been refused, are these people off their nuts or what, considering their crying out for shoppers. Its not so long ago that they were outlawed in charging 50p per transaction on a card, so have they just found a different way round it by using the present situation. I well understand that they have running costs, including banking charges, but when pricing items, all these factors should already be included. Would you be dictated to on how much more you spend, or walk, if you don't have cash on you?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by teacake44. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Banning surcharges for using cards is hardly likely to be compensated for by the money lost from being unable to process smaller card payments. The opposite in fact.
That would only work if people topped up their purchases. But who does that? Generally what happens is you find out the bad news and then you walk - because generally what else can you do.
It’s been a long time since that happened to me luckily
That would only work if people topped up their purchases. But who does that? Generally what happens is you find out the bad news and then you walk - because generally what else can you do.
It’s been a long time since that happened to me luckily
Well in the case of the fish shop, I would think there's a percentage that would just say, ok, I'll have a fish with the chips, not me stuff em. The other shops have lots of goodies near the till that you may pick up to make the difference. The best of it is this chip shop has been closed for months, makes no sense to me unless they've found that many customers fall for it.?
Small correction. Contactless is an awful way to pay. There is no feeling of spending, nor how much, until you check the damage, if you check the damage, later. Not to mention the security risks associated with money being taken from you simply by having a detectable card. Maybe bearable in an emergency, but that's about it.
OG, by using a card to pay for everything I know where my money has gone and exactly how much I have spent - I can see it there on the screen when I log in to my bank account. Which I can do as often as I like from the comfort of my own home.
Not like the days when I paid in cash and couldn't remember where I'd spent a hundred pounds in a couple of days.
My contactless cards aren't detectable unless I take them out of the little card holder I carry them in.
Not like the days when I paid in cash and couldn't remember where I'd spent a hundred pounds in a couple of days.
My contactless cards aren't detectable unless I take them out of the little card holder I carry them in.
18.12 OG, how can it be difficult to know how much you spend, you get a till receipt with every transaction, including online bank statement within two days at my bank. Some say its to easy to spend on a debit card, only if your a fool I would say, or you give in to shops who are insisting on a minimum spend.